Anshul-13J

Anshul-13J

Hey everyone, I am new to Elixir language and I am having some issues while writing a piece of code.

What I am given is a 2D array like

list1 = [
           [1 ,2,3,4,"nil"],
           [6,7,8,9,10,],
           [11,"nil",13,"nil",15],
           [16,17,"nil",19,20] ]

Now, what I’ve to do is to get all the elements that have values between 10 and 20, so what I’m doing is:


final_list = []
Enum.each(list1, fn row ->   
Enum.each(row, &(if (&1 >= 10 and &1 <= 99) do final_list = final_list ++ &1 end)) 
end
)

Doing this, I’m expecting that I’ll get my list of numbers in final_list but I’m getting blank final list with a warning like:

warning: variable "final_list" is unused (there is a variable with the same name in the context, use the pin operator (^) to match on it or prefix this variable with underscore if it is not meant to be used)
  iex:5

:ok

and upon printing final_list, it is not updated.

When I try to check whether my code is working properly or not, using IO.puts as:

iex(5)> Enum.each(list1, fn row ->                                              ...(5)> Enum.each(row, &(if (&1 >= 10 and &1 <= 99) do IO.puts(final_list ++ &1) end))     
...(5)> end
...(5)> )

The Output is:

10


11
13
15
16
17
19
20
:ok

What could I possibly be doing wrong here? Shouldn’t it add the elements to the final_list?
If this is wrong ( probably it is), what should be the possible solution to this?

Any kind of help will be appreciated.

Showing Posts 1 to 10

arcyfelix

arcyfelix

In your specific example, it is better to use Enum.reduce.

Anshul-13J

Anshul-13J OP

On it! giving it a try

kokolegorille

kokolegorille

Hello and welcome,

The code You try to write is not going to work in FP, for many reasons… mostly because data is immutable, and scope is strict. What is defined in a do end block will disappear when the block end.

It’s not an array, it’s a list of list, more prcisely they are linked lists, and do not have the same properties (Not done for index access)

The final list is not going to leak into the wrapping code.
Using Enum.each is procedural

What You should do

final_list = Enum.map(row, ...)

but because You don’t want nil, You could…

final_list = row
|> Enum.map(...)
|> Enum.filter(...)

or better, as mentionned…

final_list = row
|> Enum.reduce([], fn el, acc -> 
  if ..., do: [el | acc], else: acc
end)

You need to use other tools, like the Enum module

Anshul-13J

Anshul-13J OP

Gave it a try but still not working!

iex(12)> Enum.each(list1, fn row ->                                             ...(12)> Enum.reduce(row, fn x, final_list -> final_list = [final_list | x] end) 
...(12)> end
...(12)> )
warning: variable "final_list" is unused (there is a variable with the same name in the context, use the pin operator (^) to match on it or prefix this variable with underscore if it is not meant to be used)
  iex:13

:ok
iex(13)> final_list
[]
Anshul-13J

Anshul-13J OP

Thanks for your valuable reply, looks like I gotta lot to learn!

Trying to implement it again :smiling_face_with_tear:

Anshul-13J

Anshul-13J OP

Tried this too:

iex(14)> Enum.each(list1, fn row ->                                
...(14)> final_list = row                                          
...(14)> |> Enum.reduce([], fn el,acc ->                           
...(14)> if el >= 10 and el <= 99 do [el|acc] else acc end         
...(14)> end
...(14)> )
...(14)> end
...(14)> )

Still getting the same error :cry:

kokolegorille

kokolegorille

You might often realize that You could solve something like this with only one command.

This would be my solution.

final_list = Enum.reduce(row, [], fn 
  el, acc when el >= 10 and el <= 99 -> [el | acc] 
  _, acc -> acc
end)

You can see that You don’t need to initially set something to , You can set it in the function call.
It uses an anonymous function with multiple head, and guard clause, no need to use if.
You append an element to the list with [el | acc]
You can minimiize local variables with the use of pipe.

Oh, my code is only for 1 D, for 2 D I need to nest…

There is another tool, You might use in FP, it’s a zipper.

dpreston

dpreston

From your initial question I think you are missing a key difference between Python and Elixir. Elixir variables are immutable and you cannot modify them like you would in Python.

results = [] # <= create empty array
for x in range(1, 100):
  if 10 <= x <= 20:
    results.append(x) # <= append to the `results` array which is outside the `for` loop
  else:
   # skip x

# results = [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]

incorrectly translated to Elixir (similar to your initial attempt)

results = [] # <= create an empty array
Enum.each(1..100, fn x ->
  if x >= 10 and x <= 20, do: results = results ++ [x] # <= does NOT append to the `results` list
end)

# warning: variable "results" is unused (there is a variable with the same name in the context, use the pin operator (^) to match on it or prefix this variable with underscore if it is not meant to be used)

instead should be written

results = Enum.reduce(1..100, [], fn x, acc -> # <= assign the final value of the accumulator to results
  if x >= 10 and x <= 20 do
    acc ++ [x] # <= append x to the accumulator
  else
    acc # <= do not modify the accumulator
  end
end)

# results = [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]

The difference is that Enum.reduce builds up the accumulator array and then assigns it all to results at the end, it doesn’t modify results as it processes each element of the list.
In fact, it cannot modify results even if we wanted to.

The full solution then looks like this,

list1 = [
  [1, 2, 3, 4, "nil"],
  [6, 7, 8, 9, 10],
  [11, "nil", 13, "nil", 15],
  [16, 17, "nil", 19, 20]
]
final_list = Enum.reduce(list1, [], fn inner_list, acc ->
  acc ++ Enum.reduce(inner_list, [], fn x, acc2 ->
    if x >= 10 and x <= 20 do
      acc2 ++ [x]
    else
      acc2
    end
  end)
end)

# => [10, 11, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20]

If you don’t need to retain the nested structure or process the elements further, I would suggest a different approach. First flatten the inner lists and then filter with a simple boolean test.

final_list = list1 
|> List.flatten()
|> Enum.filter(&(&1 >=10 and &1 <= 20))

# final_list = [10, 11, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20]
dimitarvp

dimitarvp

Banging your head against the wall is a slow way to learn, dude. Trust me I know, I’ve done the same way too many times.

You have to assign the result of almost every function to a variable in Elixir because it does NOT change a variable in place like in Python in many others; it returns a modified copy of the variable.

list = []
Enum.each([1,2,3], fn x ->
  list = list ++ (x*2)
end)

List is still [] in the end because the internal expression list = list ++ (x*2) is staying there and not going anywhere.

If you run the above you’ll get this message:

warning: variable "list" is unused (there is a variable with the same name in the context, use the pin operator (^) to match on it or prefix this variable with underscore if it is not meant to be used)

It’s telling you that you are throwing away list from inside the Enum.each block.

The way you would achieve the desired result is this:

list = Enum.map([1,2,3], fn x ->
  x * 2
end)

This goes through each element of the list, modifies it, and appends it to a resulting list.

TL;DR forget about using Enum.each or for to modify variables. They are not used for that, only for side effects (like printing to terminal, writing to files or external network services etc.)

Anshul-13J

Anshul-13J OP

Really helpful one!

The thing is, I am understanding the code, but having issues in writing it! The syntax is a bit changed from languages like Cpp and Python, but I guess I’ll get there. Just need some practice!

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
RemyXRenard
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
samoloth
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Dmk
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New

Latest on Elixir Forum

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews