jdellitt
Is it possible to pause a Workflow then continue it at a later time? For example, we’d like to start a Workflow with several Jobs, but want to put it into a suspended/paused state until some external event occurs (like a webhook), which would satisfy the dependency and resume the rest of the workflow. Been looking through the docs, and haven’t seen anything, so just wanting to rule out whether or not it’s possible. Thanks!
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #security











Showing Posts 1 to 6- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
cevado
Doesn’t appeding jobs to a workflow solve your issue?
You can create a workflow with all the jobs that doesn’t rely on the webhook.
When the webhook happens, you can append the jobs that depend on the webhook and include their dependency on other jobs.
This way you never need to worry about the “state” of the jobs in that workflow, Oban takes care of the dependencies after you append the new jobs.
jdellitt
Thanks @cevado, I do think that could work, but I was hoping to be able to define the whole Workflow up front (in a single place) as opposed to having that logic in two different places.
It seems like we may need to have a job in the middle that essentially checks for a condition and snoozes itself itself if that condition hasn’t been fulfilled.
cevado
you can make the code that append the jobs as a public function in the workflow module. this way you keep all the data about the workflow in the workflow module without needing to create a job that starves the queue/workers without a good reason.
you could even use the meta option of a job to add some internal identifiers that makes it easier to find the workflow when the webhook happens.
bkilshaw
@jdellitt Did you ever figure this out by any chance?
jdellitt
No, unfortunately. I think we ended up going in a different direction altogether.
sorentwo
As alluded earlier in this thread, the way we usually suggest doing this is to have the job you’d like to pause snooze itself in a loop, with a limit to prevent unbounded retries. Here’s an example:
You can optionally use
uniqueandreplaceto upsert the snoozing job to run immediately, but it requires carefully setting theworkflow_id:This question comes up rather frequently though, and a proper
Oban.Pro.Workflow.pause/1andOban.Pro.Workflow.resume/1seem warranted