Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Background
I am trying to build an OTP compliant app using supervisors. However I am having trouble interpreting a part of the documentation.
Docs
The documentation states that Supervisor.start_link/2 returns the following:
{:ok, pid}
| :ignore
| {:error, {:already_started, pid} | {:shutdown,term} | [term]}
Problem
The problem is that even though the documentation specifies when start_link returns {:ok, pid} and {:error, any} it doesn’t specify when it returns :ignore, leaving me to think that it can never return :ignore.
Question
In which cases does Supervisor.start_link/2 return :ignore?
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #security










Showing Posts 15 to 6- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
sasajuric
Ah, good point! I forgot about the optional options thing for
start_link/3. Yeah, in that case,:ignoreis indeed a valid return value.peerreynders
It is this type of thing why I would give priority to
[Erlang] Designing for Scalability with Erlang/OTP (O'Reilly)
over
The Little Elixir & OTP Guidebook (Manning)
This goes back to the Erlang documentation:
LostKobrakai
It surely can if at least for the
Supervisor.start_link/3version, but skipping the optional options, which are the 3rd parameter.sasajuric
I believe you actually got it right initially. It seems that
Supervisor.start_link/2can’t return:ignore(unless I’m missing some nuance, since I didn’t bother to read the code ofSupervisor). Even the docs forstart_link/2don’t mention it.You can consider making a PR which would tighten the specification for
start_link/2.LostKobrakai
In my opinion it doesn’t really belong to
start_link. It’s a behaviour for theinit/1callback, as you can see in the GenServer module, where it’s even mentioned in the documentation text.Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Excellent example!
But where is that code is the usage of
Supervisor.start_link/2?EDIT: ignore me, I get it now.
Thanks for the help!
LostKobrakai
When the supervisor itself (it’s
init/1) returns:ignorethenSupervisor.start_linkreturns:ignore.E.g.
peerreynders
A supervisor can be a child of a supervisor.
Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Forgive me for my ignorance, but I still don’t see how any of this affects the return value of
Supervisor.start_link/2If a child returns an error, the supervisor returns one.
If a child returns :ok or :ignore, the supervisor returns :ok.
So … when really?
LostKobrakai
A supervisor has an
init/1callback as well as workers have. So both actually work the same in regards to returning:ignorefrom that callback.