rept

rept

Hi,

I currently have a RoR application that uses the Sneakers gem to monitor RabbitMQ queues and process messages. I’m looking into migrating this to Elixir and have started experimenting. We have about 20 queues, all with different logic that needs to be processed.

I was able to get Broadway up and running and want to create a worker per queue (or per 2 - 3 queues that share business logic). So I started creating workers like this:

defmodule MessageWorker do
  require Logger
  use Broadway

  @queue_names ~w(messages)

  def start_link(_opts) do
    Broadway.start_link(__MODULE__,
      name: __MODULE__,
      producer: [
        module: {BroadwayRabbitMQ.Producer,
          queue: "",
          connection: [
            username: "guest",
            password: "guest",
            host: "localhost"
          ],
          merge_options: fn (index) ->
            queue_name = Enum.fetch!(@queue_names, index)
            Logger.info(" connecting to queue #{queue_name}")
            [queue: queue_name]
          end
        },
        concurrency: 1
      ],
      processors: [
        default: [
          concurrency: 10
        ]
      ]
    )
  end

  @spec handle_message(any, any, any) :: none
  def handle_message(_, message, _context) do
    Broadway.Message.ack_immediately(message)
    IO.inspect(message.data, label: "MESSAGE Got message")
  end

end

This all seems to work, which is great. However since the start_link will be the same for all workers (except for the queue name and maybe the number of processors I would like to put this ‘somewhere’ so I could avoid the code being duplicated in each worker. I just want each worker to specify the queue(s) to monitor and the concurrency. So the complete start_link method shouldn’t be duplicated.

How can I do this?

Showing Posts 1 to 6

axelson

axelson

Scenic Core Team

I would recommend creating a helper module for this. Here’s how one might look:

defmodule MessageWorkerUtils do
 def broadway_options(module_name, queue_names) do
    [
      name: module_name,
      producer: [
        module: {BroadwayRabbitMQ.Producer,
          queue: "",
          connection: [
            username: "guest",
            password: "guest",
            host: "localhost"
          ],
          merge_options: fn (index) ->
            queue_name = Enum.fetch!(queue_names, index)
            Logger.info(" connecting to queue #{queue_name}")
            [queue: queue_name]
          end
        },
        concurrency: 1
      ],
      processors: [
        default: [
          concurrency: 10
        ]
      ]
    )
  ]
end

Then you could call it in your start_link like:

def start_link(_opts) do
  options = MessageWorkerUtils.broadway_options(__MODULE__, @queue_names)
  Broadway.start_link(__MODULE__, options)
end

And welcome to the forum! :wave:

rept

rept OP

Hi @axelson,

Thanks a lot! Tried it out and this works great.

Aetherus

Aetherus

I don’t know if this is a good idea, but it sounds like we could use a little bit metaprogramming.

defmodule MQWorker do
  @callback handle_message(any(), any(), any()) :: none()

  defmacro __using__(queue_names) do
    quote do
      @behaviour unquote(__MODULE__)

      def start_link(_opts) do
        Broadway.start_link(__MODULE__,
          name: __MODULE__,
          producer: [
            module: {BroadwayRabbitMQ.Producer,
              queue: "",
              connection: [
                username: "guest",
                password: "guest",
                host: "localhost"
              ],
              merge_options: fn (index) ->
                queue_name = Enum.fetch!(unquote(queue_names), index)  #<---- Replace `@queue_names` with `unquote(queue_names)`
                Logger.info(" connecting to queue #{queue_name}")
                [queue: queue_name]
              end
            },
            concurrency: 1
          ],
          processors: [
            default: [
              concurrency: 10
            ]
          ]
        )
      end
    end
  end
end

Then in each of your actual worker module, just use MQWorker, ["queue1", "queue2", ...] and implement handle_message/3

gregvaughn

gregvaughn

I may be missing some complexity, but can’t you just pass the variable bits into the opts param of start_link that you’re not using?

Aetherus

Aetherus

The problem is, for different queues, there are different message handling logic. Maybe we can pack each queue name and the corresponding message handling into a module, and pass that module to a “factory function” that creates the process.

rept

rept OP

I tried the metaprogramming suggestion, works too and looks even cleaner!

Thanks.

I’ve added workers like this:

defmacro __using__({queue_names, workers}) do

....

      processors: [
        default: [
          concurrency: unquote(workers)
        ]
      ]

And now call it like this:

use MQWorker, {["messages2"], 10}

Seems to work.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews