Oliver

Oliver

In file 1:

defmodule Utils.Struct do

  # this is for importing definitions when "use Utils.Struct" is called
  defmacro __using__(_opts) do
    quote do
      import Utils.Struct
    end
  end

  defmacro defstruct_module(struct_name, fields) do
    quote do
      defmodule unquote(struct_name) do
        use Utils.Access
        defstruct unquote(fields)
      end
    end
  end

end

In file 2:

defmodule Statistical.Generator do

use Utils.Struct

@in_files [:in_cause, :out_cause, :start]

defstruct_module(State, @in_files)

Breaks:

warning: undefined module attribute @in_files, please remove access to @in_files or explicitly set it before access
  <some file>: Statistical.Generator.State (module)


== Compilation error in file <some file> ==
** (ArgumentError) struct fields definition must be list, got: nil
    (elixir 1.14.4) lib/kernel/utils.ex:117: Kernel.Utils.defstruct/3

But this works - again file 2:

defmodule Statistical.Generator do

use Utils.Struct

@in_files [:in_cause, :out_cause, :start]
in_files = @in_files

defstruct_module(State, in_files)

By the way, if I use the variable approach instead of the module attribute, than the def blocks of the module in file 2 complain… can’t win? :sweat_smile:

Is this because the it inserts the module attribute verbatim as abstract syntax tree? Is there a construct/pattern to handle this case - like would a bind_quote help?

Thank you!

Showing Posts 1 to 6

DaAnalyst

DaAnalyst

To use the module attributes in your macro, you’ll need to do it in __before_compile__/1.

Take a look at this upgrade of my library which was done precisely for the same reason
(see the difference between v0.2.0 and v0.1.0) - kudos and thanks to @kip

https://github.com/DaTrader/assigns

Oliver

Oliver OP

If I understand your code correctly it tries to find an attribute in the calling module and use it in the macro.

I think my scenario is a bit different - I’m trying to pass a value to the macro, and it’s not always a module attribute either. I typically call it like this:

defstruct_module(State, [:some, :fields])

If I understand what you’re doing, it might be possible to match for “module attribute” in a separate head for the same macro and then use Module.get_attribute/3 and call the other Macro head with it?

We tried Macro.expand(param, __CALLER__) and it remained nil.

If you meant something else, please let me know.

DaAnalyst

DaAnalyst

No, it’s the same case. My lib is also mostly taking lists of atom keys as such, but I needed it to support taking a module attribute as well, hence the change.

josevalim

josevalim

Creator of Elixir

Correct. You could instead first unquote it in its actual scope:

    quote do
      fields = unquote(fields)
      defmodule unquote(struct_name) do
        use Utils.Access
        defstruct fields
      end
    end
Oliver

Oliver OP

Thank you both!

Let me preface this with the fact that I can live with adding an extra variable on top-level by hand if that’s easiest.

But I still want to follow up with you.

@josevalim - I tried your solution, and it works for the module atttribute case.

Another use case then has a different problem:

defstruct_module(Channel.Quality, [<... some fields ...>])
[...]
defstruct_module(Model.Params,   [channel:         %Channel.Quality{}])

Will result in:

== Compilation error in file lib/model.ex ==
** (CompileError) lib/model.ex:20: cannot access struct Channel.Quality, the struct was not yet defined or the struct is being accessed in the same context that defines it
    expanding struct: Channel.Quality.__struct__/1
    lib/model.ex:20: (file)
    expanding macro: Utils.Struct.defstruct_module/2
    lib/model.ex:20: (file)

I assume this is due to the fields list being expanded now outside the defmodule and compiled before that “inner module” was compiled yet?

The original version worked with that scenario where the list was given directly.

I tried bind_quoted but then I also need to use it on struct_name field and then aliases are expanded differently (and no longer include the name of any module defined one level higher).

It’s a tricky one… There’s always a scope where it doesn’t come together.

@DaAnalyst -

I know it’s on me / is my fault, but I’m looking at the diff of your project and I just can’t see how that pertains to my problem. My mind doesn’t make the connection.

DaAnalyst

DaAnalyst

If you look at my lib code, you’ll see that in its first version (0.1.0) it simply relied on the vanilla macros to expand the def assign_* and friends. The problem with that approach was that it could only take a list of atoms and not a module attribute (to which a list of atoms is assigned) because the module attribute was not resolvable at the time of the macro expansion. The __before_compile__/1 approach that was suggested by @kip solved this (as shown in the version 0.2.0) because at the time it expands it can resolve the module attributes, hence the necessary refactoring.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
RemyXRenard
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
samoloth
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
FlyingNoodle
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Dmk
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
netoum
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews