alexcastano

alexcastano

Hello,

I want to store a structured raw input in a JSONB column. This raw input is already in an embedded schema because it has been previously validated. However, the raw input can be of different type, some of the types being quite complex, as they have deeply nested structures.

When I had only 4 different types, I had a column for each one and I handled the polymorphism by myself:

schema "table" do
  ...
  embeds_one type_one, TypeOne
  embeds_one type_two, TypeTwo
  ...
end

But now, I want to add a lot more types, and I don’t think is efficient to have 30 different columns. So I would like to store the information in the same column, but when loading the record using a type field, it would load one structure or another.

I’m trying to use Ecto.Type to do this job, but I find myself doing a lot of work that was previously handled by Ecto:

First, I have to @derive {Jason.Encoder, only: [...]} in a lot of schemas. It feels wrong because I’m forced to use this protocol to store this information in one way. If I want to use the same protocol for another use, for example to encode in a JSON API, I won’t be able to do it in the future.

Also, I’m creating a lot of functions to load the raw JSON in the structures, basically using cast and cast_embed with all the stored fields.

So, I don’t know if I’m missing something, but I’d like to use functionalities that are already in Ecto with embeds_one to load, dump, embed_as, etc. my custom Ecto.Type. Do you think it would be possible?

Do you think is a good solution in general terms? Any advice?

Most Liked

mathieuprog

mathieuprog

I published a library that brings support for polymorphic embeds :backhand_index_pointing_down:

https://github.com/mathieuprog/polymorphic_embed

Eiji

Eiji

@alexcastano Of course it’s possible, but ecto itself does not helps in complex polymorphic use cases, so you would need to write it yourself.

First of all you would need to have your JSON like:

{"data": …, "type": "your_type_name"}

For it you would need to create a custom Ecto.Type. For each callback you need to check type field and based on it you would need to create n number of modules which also implements Ecto.Type.

Let’s say:

defmodule MyApp.EctoTypes.MainJSON do
  use Ecto.Type

  def ecto_callback(%{data: data, type: type}) do
    with {:ok, result} <- type |> find_module() |> :apply(:ecto_callback, [data]) do
      %{data: result, type: type}
    end
  end

  defp find_module("first_type"), do: MyApp.EctoTypes.FirstType
  defp find_module("second_type"), do: MyApp.EctoTypes.SecondType
  defp find_module("third_type"), do: MyApp.EctoTypes.ThirdType
end

defmodule MyApp.EctoTypes.FirstType do
  # no need to use Ecto.Type here
  # as this those "sub types" would be used only for Kernel.apply/3
  # in order to simply separate code for each type

  def ecto_callback(data) do
    # …
  end
end

In such way you can simply write a code for each type. You only need to implement each Ecto.Type required callback (cast, dump and load if I remember correctly).

If you do this all you need to do (like migrations) is exactly the same as with embeds_many or embeds_one. I wrote all from memory, but it should work even with arrays.

defmodule MyApp.MyContext.MySchema do
  alias MyApp.EctoTypes.MainJSON

  schema "table_name" do
    …
    field(:field_name, {:array, MainJSON})
    …
  end
end

The only difference is that you no longer need to call cast_embed and related functions as everything would be handled in cast.

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

Have you looked at GitHub - greenboxal/ecto_poly: Polymorphic embeds for Ecto · GitHub ? I haven’t tried it yet, but it seems pretty close to what you’re looking for.

EDIT: looks like Ecto 3 compatibility is still in-flight Ecto 3.x by jeanparpaillon · Pull Request #1 · greenboxal/ecto_poly · GitHub

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
RemyXRenard
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
samoloth
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
FlyingNoodle
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Dmk
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
netoum
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews