fireproofsocks

fireproofsocks

I have discovered something curious: when one test macro creates a row, that row is still visible to another test. I only noticed this occurring because this particular schema is dealing with user-generated primary keys (sort of an ersatz enum – it’s a very small table).

I’m doing a full drop and create before my test runs, so I know that the data isn’t stuck in there from some other process. Here’s my alias from mix.exs:

defp aliases do
  [
    test: ["ecto.drop", "ecto.create", "ecto.migrate", "run priv/repo/seeds.exs", "test"]
  ]
end

I feel like this might be something like threads getting crossed… e.g. if test1 creates a record with primary key “X”, then test2 attempts to create a record with primary key “X”, there’s a problem.

1) test update/2 returns :ok when updating an existing thing (MyApp.Contexts.ThingContextTest)
     test/contexts/thing_context_test.exs:53
     ** (Ecto.ConstraintError) constraint error when attempting to insert struct:

         * thing_pkey (unique_constraint)

     If you would like to stop this constraint violation from raising an
     exception and instead add it as an error to your changeset, please
     call `unique_constraint/3` on your changeset with the constraint
     `:name` as an option.

     The changeset defined the following constraints:

         * thing_id_index (unique_constraint)

     code: status_fixture(%{
     stacktrace:
       (ecto) lib/ecto/repo/schema.ex:689: anonymous fn/4 in Ecto.Repo.Schema.constraints_to_errors/3
       (elixir) lib/enum.ex:1327: Enum."-map/2-lists^map/1-0-"/2
       (ecto) lib/ecto/repo/schema.ex:674: Ecto.Repo.Schema.constraints_to_errors/3
       (ecto) lib/ecto/repo/schema.ex:276: anonymous fn/15 in Ecto.Repo.Schema.do_insert/3
       test/contexts/wholesale_partner_status_context_test.exs:55: (test)

I haven’t run up against this exact behavior even though I’ve done the same type of thing for other modules (i.e. with string primary keys), so I thought maybe it had something to do with how the application was started? My test helper is simply doing ExUnit.start() and I’m doing a simple use ExUnit.Case (no async).

If I run the tests in the module 1 at a time, they all pass, e.g. mix test test/contexts/thing_test.exs:66

Any ideas?

Many thanks for any pointers!

Showing Posts 1 to 8

NobbZ

NobbZ

Have you sandboxing enabled for ecto?

fireproofsocks

fireproofsocks OP

I think so. This is my test config:

use Mix.Config

config :myapp,
  MyApp.Repo,
  username: System.get_env("DB_USER") || "postgres",
  password: System.get_env("DB_PASS") || "",
  database: System.get_env("DB") || "myapp_test",
  hostname: System.get_env("DB_HOST") || "127.0.0.1",
  pool: Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox
fireproofsocks

fireproofsocks OP

AHA. I Found it. I had copied and pasted the WRONG repo in my test:

setup do
  :ok = Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox.checkout(WrongThing.Repo)
end

Should have been

setup do
  :ok = Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox.checkout(Thing.Repo)
end
axelson

axelson

Scenic Core Team

Also I’m pretty sure that a :pool config on the repo doesn’t do anything you should probably drop the pool: Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox option from there.

NobbZ

NobbZ

AFAIR this is how it falls out of the generators…

axelson

axelson

Scenic Core Team
NobbZ

NobbZ

Its from the generator, but as it seems not from the templates:

$ mix phx.new foo
$ tail -6 foo/config/test.exs
config :foo, Foo.Repo,
  username: "postgres",
  password: "postgres",
  database: "foo_test",
  hostname: "localhost",
  pool: Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox
axelson

axelson

Scenic Core Team

Ah, I see. :pool is configuration for Ecto.Adapters.Postgres: Ecto.Adapters.Postgres — Ecto SQL v3.14.0

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
ryanwinchester
apply_graft/2 doesn’t rewrite an add_many sub-workflow’s deps on an add step. Grafted jobs cancel with “upstream job was deleted” Version...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Dmk
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
netoum
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews