Malian
Magic Link with a Mobile application (universal links, jwt)
I am trying to authenticate my users in a mobile app via email-based Magic Link provided by Ash. The idea is to use Universal Links/AppLinks. The user taps their email like in a web version of the magic link, he receives an email, click on va magic link and with Universal/App links, the application is opened instead of the browser. The mobile application receive the “magic link token”, and then I can ask for an exchange with a JWT token. I also would like to keep the magic link behavior for the web part and creating the user if he does not exist.
What I have done:
- I generated a fresh Ash project with MagicLink authentication (no password strategy)
- Universal/App links work
- I created a new endpoint under the
apipipeline to disable the CSRF for that endpoint and request a magic login link: /mobile/auth/magic-link/request. It works, but I am not sure I do it the Ash way. - Same for login with mobile magic link.
Here is my controller:
def request_mobile_magic_link(conn, %{"email" => email}) when is_binary(email) do
input =
User
|> Ash.ActionInput.for_action(:request_magic_link, %{email: email})
|> Ash.ActionInput.set_context(%{private: %{ash_authentication?: true}})
case Ash.run_action(input) do
:ok ->
send_resp(conn, :ok, "")
{:error, error} ->
Logger.warning("request_magic_link error: #{Exception.message(error)}")
send_resp(conn, :ok, "")
end
end
def sign_in_with_mobile_magic_link(conn, %{"token" => _token} = params) do
User
|> Ash.Changeset.for_create(:sign_in_with_magic_link, params)
|> Ash.Changeset.set_context(%{private: %{ash_authentication?: true}})
|> Ash.create()
|> case do
{:ok, record} ->
{:ok, token, _claims} = AshAuthentication.Jwt.token_for_user(record, %{})
conn
|> put_resp_header("content-type", "application/json")
|> send_resp(:ok, JSON.encode!(%{token: token}))
{:error, error} ->
{:error,
AshAuthentication.Errors.AuthenticationFailed.exception(
strategy: AshAuthentication.Strategy.MagicLink,
caused_by: error
)}
end
end
I add to set the context with %{private: %{ash_authentication?: true}}in both methods otherwise I received a forbidden error due to the forbid_if always()policy, except for the bypass ash_authentication/lib/ash_authentication/checks/ash_authentication_interaction.ex at main · team-alembic/ash_authentication · GitHub
I created another endpoint to login from mobile, as I want to keep the magic login link from web, and I want to return a JWT token on success.
Should I create another bypass, or is it fine to set a private key?
I need two different emails depending if the user is requesting a magic link from the mobile app or from the web app. I would like to pass a mobile?: trueoption to the third argument of the sendmethod but I do not find how to achieve that? I tried to add it to the context.
Here is the action on the User resource (generated by Ash):
create :sign_in_with_magic_link do
description "Sign in or register a user with magic link."
argument :token, :string do
description "The token from the magic link that was sent to the user"
allow_nil? false
end
upsert? true
upsert_identity :unique_email
upsert_fields [:email]
# Uses the information from the token to create or sign in the user
change AshAuthentication.Strategy.MagicLink.SignInChange
metadata :token, :string do
allow_nil? false
end
end
I do not understand the purpose of “metadata :token, :string …” and I didn’t find doc about this. Could someone explain me or point me to a doc/blog post?
It also seems that the AshAuthentication.Strategy.MagicLink.SignInChange, put a JWT token under the metadata of the resource but I am not able to retrieve it with resource.__meta__.token. This is the reason why I generated one in the controller.
Finally, I would like to know if this is the correct Ash way to do things or if I miss something more obvious.
I’m new to Ash, so I admit I’m still struggling with some concepts. Feel free to redirect me to the right documentation resource.
Marked As Solved
Malian
After further investigation, main should solve one of my current issue. The source_context is merged into the opts of the sender (ash_authentication/lib/ash_authentication/strategies/magic_link/request.ex at main · team-alembic/ash_authentication · GitHub) so I should be able to distinguish between mobile and web request.
I still don’t understand why I have to set %{private: %{ash_authentication?: true}} as it seems this is already done in the action: ash_authentication/lib/ash_authentication/strategies/magic_link/request.ex at main · team-alembic/ash_authentication · GitHub
Also Liked
zachdaniel
That context there is set on an internal action called from that action itself. The context is set explicitly when AshAuthentication is triggering an action, but in this case you are triggering the action, and thus the policy is rejecting the request. You can get around that one of two ways:
- your current way, by saying “actually this is ash authentication doing the work”
- add a different context, actor, or something else, and adding a policy/bypass to allow a request meeting that condition








