Malian

Malian

Magic Link with a Mobile application (universal links, jwt)

I am trying to authenticate my users in a mobile app via email-based Magic Link provided by Ash. The idea is to use Universal Links/AppLinks. The user taps their email like in a web version of the magic link, he receives an email, click on va magic link and with Universal/App links, the application is opened instead of the browser. The mobile application receive the “magic link token”, and then I can ask for an exchange with a JWT token. I also would like to keep the magic link behavior for the web part and creating the user if he does not exist.

What I have done:

  • I generated a fresh Ash project with MagicLink authentication (no password strategy)
  • Universal/App links work
  • I created a new endpoint under the apipipeline to disable the CSRF for that endpoint and request a magic login link: /mobile/auth/magic-link/request. It works, but I am not sure I do it the Ash way.
  • Same for login with mobile magic link.

Here is my controller:

  def request_mobile_magic_link(conn, %{"email" => email}) when is_binary(email) do
    input =
      User
      |> Ash.ActionInput.for_action(:request_magic_link, %{email: email})
      |> Ash.ActionInput.set_context(%{private: %{ash_authentication?: true}})

    case Ash.run_action(input) do
      :ok ->
        send_resp(conn, :ok, "")

      {:error, error} ->
        Logger.warning("request_magic_link error: #{Exception.message(error)}")
        send_resp(conn, :ok, "")
    end
  end

  def sign_in_with_mobile_magic_link(conn, %{"token" => _token} = params) do
    User
    |> Ash.Changeset.for_create(:sign_in_with_magic_link, params)
    |> Ash.Changeset.set_context(%{private: %{ash_authentication?: true}})
    |> Ash.create()
    |> case do
          {:ok, record} ->
            {:ok, token, _claims} = AshAuthentication.Jwt.token_for_user(record, %{})

            conn
            |> put_resp_header("content-type", "application/json")
            |> send_resp(:ok, JSON.encode!(%{token: token}))

          {:error, error} ->
            {:error,
             AshAuthentication.Errors.AuthenticationFailed.exception(
               strategy: AshAuthentication.Strategy.MagicLink,
               caused_by: error
             )}
        end
  end

I add to set the context with %{private: %{ash_authentication?: true}}in both methods otherwise I received a forbidden error due to the forbid_if always()policy, except for the bypass ash_authentication/lib/ash_authentication/checks/ash_authentication_interaction.ex at main · team-alembic/ash_authentication · GitHub

I created another endpoint to login from mobile, as I want to keep the magic login link from web, and I want to return a JWT token on success.

Should I create another bypass, or is it fine to set a private key?

I need two different emails depending if the user is requesting a magic link from the mobile app or from the web app. I would like to pass a mobile?: trueoption to the third argument of the sendmethod but I do not find how to achieve that? I tried to add it to the context.

Here is the action on the User resource (generated by Ash):

    create :sign_in_with_magic_link do
      description "Sign in or register a user with magic link."

      argument :token, :string do
        description "The token from the magic link that was sent to the user"
        allow_nil? false
      end

      upsert? true
      upsert_identity :unique_email
      upsert_fields [:email]

      # Uses the information from the token to create or sign in the user
      change AshAuthentication.Strategy.MagicLink.SignInChange

      metadata :token, :string do
        allow_nil? false
      end
    end

I do not understand the purpose of “metadata :token, :string …” and I didn’t find doc about this. Could someone explain me or point me to a doc/blog post?

It also seems that the AshAuthentication.Strategy.MagicLink.SignInChange, put a JWT token under the metadata of the resource but I am not able to retrieve it with resource.__meta__.token. This is the reason why I generated one in the controller.

Finally, I would like to know if this is the correct Ash way to do things or if I miss something more obvious.

I’m new to Ash, so I admit I’m still struggling with some concepts. Feel free to redirect me to the right documentation resource.

Marked As Solved

Malian

Malian

After further investigation, main should solve one of my current issue. The source_context is merged into the opts of the sender (ash_authentication/lib/ash_authentication/strategies/magic_link/request.ex at main · team-alembic/ash_authentication · GitHub) so I should be able to distinguish between mobile and web request.

I still don’t understand why I have to set %{private: %{ash_authentication?: true}} as it seems this is already done in the action: ash_authentication/lib/ash_authentication/strategies/magic_link/request.ex at main · team-alembic/ash_authentication · GitHub

Also Liked

zachdaniel

zachdaniel

Creator of Ash

That context there is set on an internal action called from that action itself. The context is set explicitly when AshAuthentication is triggering an action, but in this case you are triggering the action, and thus the policy is rejecting the request. You can get around that one of two ways:

  • your current way, by saying “actually this is ash authentication doing the work”
  • add a different context, actor, or something else, and adding a policy/bypass to allow a request meeting that condition

Last Post!

zachdaniel

zachdaniel

Creator of Ash

That context there is set on an internal action called from that action itself. The context is set explicitly when AshAuthentication is triggering an action, but in this case you are triggering the action, and thus the policy is rejecting the request. You can get around that one of two ways:

  • your current way, by saying “actually this is ash authentication doing the work”
  • add a different context, actor, or something else, and adding a policy/bypass to allow a request meeting that condition

Where Next?

Popular in Questions Top

nobody
Hi! In PHP: $_SERVER[‘SERVER_ADDR’] - in Elixir? Searched the docs for ip address and the web, no good results. Thanks!
New
hariharasudhan94
Lets say I have map like this fetching from my database %{"_id" => #BSON.ObjectId<58eb1a7a9ad169198c3dXXXX>, "email" => ...
New
hariharasudhan94
lets say i have a sample like a = 20; b = 10; if (a > b) do {:ok, "a"} end if (a < b) do {:ok, b} end if (a == b) do {:ok, "equa...
New
stefanchrobot
What’s the safe way to decode a JSON string into a struct? I want to avoid calling String.to_atom. Jason.decode can give me a map with st...
New
Lily
In templates/appointment/index.html.eex: <%= for appointment <- @appointments do %> <tr> <td><%= appoi...
New
sergio_101
I am VERY much an elixir newbie. I have taken one elixir course and one phoenix course on Udemy. During that course, I saw the instructor...
New
shijith.k
I am trying to start a new phoenix project with elixir 1.9, but mix phx.new does not work. It says that ** (Mix) The task "phx.new" could...
New

Other popular topics Top

nobody
Hi! In PHP: $_SERVER[‘SERVER_ADDR’] - in Elixir? Searched the docs for ip address and the web, no good results. Thanks!
New
grych
Hi folks, Few months ago I have announced the proof-of-concept of the library to manipulate the browsers DOM objects directly from Elixi...
639 54006 488
New
vonH
When I run the Plug and I recompile I wind up having to use Ctrl C to quit iex and start again. Witht the help of rlwrap I can use the cu...
New
openscript
Hello! Sorry for this astonishing simple question, but I’m really stuck. I try to set up the intellij-elixir plugin, but I don’t know ho...
New
chrismccord
Phoenix 1.4.0 released Phoenix 1.4 is out! This release ships with exciting new features, most notably with HTTP2 support, improved deve...
688 31494 112
New
Harrisonl
We have an ECS cluster with 4 services, where each task joins a single cluster, via discovery ECS discovery service. Currently when I de...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement