zkessin
I want to add Credo to an existing project, and of course, when it runs it flags a lot of problems. What I want to know is there a built-in way to cause Credo to ignore the known issues, but report an error on new issues that may come up? That way the existing issues can be handled over time while we prevent any more issues from happening
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming











Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
srowley
I am not aware of anything Credo does to remember results of prior runs, but it does allow you to ignore specific lines or files, if you are willing able to go through the code and apply those exceptions.
hauleth
You can use ReviewDog to filter out failures limiting them to only the errors in current diff.
zoldar
As a kind of a workaround, you could use
gitto select only files that changed relative to the base branch for credo checks. It’s still coarse grained but allows for incrementally improving credo compliance of the code base (however that assumes branch-based workflow so YMMV).NOTE: I didn’t run this code (it’s a heavily edited and simplified version of an existing solution). It should give an idea though.
m1dnight
I noticed @hauleth s comment and I decided to figure out how to do it locally.
My workflow would be to run credo on my current changes not staged for committing. To only get reports on the current unstaged changes is done as follows.
mix credo --strict --format=flycheck | reviewdog -efm="%f:%l:%c: %t: %m" -efm="%f:%l: %t: %m" -name="credo" -diff="git diff"The key here is to play around with the -diff command. That’s the output reviewdog will use to determine which violations (according to credo) are relevant to show you.
Say you want to get only new issues since you created your feature branch off of the develop branch, this will do too:
mix credo --strict --format=flycheck | reviewdog -efm="%f:%l:%c: %t: %m" -efm="%f:%l: %t: %m" -name="credo" -diff="git diff HEAD $(git merge-base HEAD develop) "