jan-swiatek
Hi
,
I want to insert user and company at once (user belongs to company, company can have many users) using Ecto.Multi. Here is my current form:
<.simple_form :let={f} for={@changeset} action={~p"/users/register"}>
<.inputs_for :let={company} field={f[:company]}>
<.input field={company[:name]} type="text" label="Company" />
</.inputs_for>
<.input field={f[:email]} type="email" label="Email" required />
<.input field={f[:password]} type="password" label="Password" required />
<:actions>
<.button phx-disable-with="Creating account..." class="w-full">Create an account</.button>
</:actions>
</.simple_form>
and Ecto.Multi transaction:
def register(user_params, company_params) do
Multi.new()
|> Multi.run(:company, fn _repo, _changes ->
case Companies.create_company(company_params) do
{:ok, %{company: company}} -> {:ok, company}
{:error, :company, changeset, _} -> {:error, changeset}
end
end)
|> Multi.run(:user, fn _repo, %{company: company} ->
user_params
|> Map.put("company_id", company.id)
|> Accounts.register_user()
end)
|> Repo.transaction()
end
However if something went wrong while creating company (e.g. name was already taken) I got Company changeset, what causes an error: “could not generate inputs for :company from MyApp.Companies” (it expects User changeset). What is the most idiomatic approach in this case? I can’t use cast_assoc, since create_company is Multi transaction itself (it also invokes some additional steps).
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #security










Showing Posts 4 to 1- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
dimitarvp
It’s useful for future readers if you show how.
jan-swiatek
Thanks for replies. I ended up with reorganising code a bit (I changed order of functions in transactions) and I was able to use
cast_assoctfwright
I would say that there is nothing as strong as an “idiom” for cases like this. Hard to say for sure since there’s a piece of your code missing but the problem appears to be that your register function is missing logic for handling different results of each Multi operation. I think the most important pattern you can/should be taking advantage of there is Ecto’s schemaless changesets to add a layer in between your UI (form) and and BE (context). You would handle any validations there, and then in your register function would no longer need to provide error handling.
slouchpie
The error you quoted sounds like a Phoenix HTML error message. Presumably you are using the result of the
registerfunction and assigning it some kind ofsocket.assigns.changesetor something like that? The problem is happening then because you are assigning a Company changeset where it should be a User changeset.I can suggest a straightforward solution. In your view (is it a LiveView?) where you call the
registerfunction and handle the result, pattern match the result to see if it is a Company changeset. Then do something like:It is difficult for me to imagine a better approach because there are too many unknowns. It would be cleaner if you could
cast_assocthe user on the company or vice-versa but without knowing what thecreate_companyMulti does, and without knowing if a user can have many companies, or vice versa, it is difficult to advise. Butcast_assocworks well with associations in forms. It is where thesort_paramanddrop_parammagic live. I strongly advise usingcast_associf you can.It might be a good exercise to try to add a
@specto yourregisterfunction. This will force you to think about the possible outputs.It might also be worthwhile to write the
registerfunction as a single Multi pipeline, without the nestedRepo.transactionincreate_company. You can keepcreate_companyas it is written but split out the ecto multi part so you have a function like this:Then you can rewrite
registerto pipe into thecreate_company_multifunction.