klo
i have an app app1 which uses ExAws.Lambda.invoke/4. All is well and no compile warnings.
Another app say app2 uses app1 as a dependency. For some reason I get a compile warning: ExAws.Lambda.invoke/4 is undefined (module ExAws.Lambda is not available or is yet to be defined) lib/app2/client.ex:40: App2.Client.get_page/2.
Now in App1, i have aliased
alias ExAws.Lambda and calling the function as such:
function_name
|> Lambda.invoke(
config,
%{},
invocation_type: :request_response
)
|> ex_aws.request()
The warning comes from app2 on a fresh compile but not on subsequent compiles even when forced using the --force option. I also have to remove _build and deps for the warning to show.
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 6 to 1- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
klo
yep! the solution was to remove the
optional: trueand all was fine. The warning was gone from the parent app.fireproofsocks
The cause can be if the “child” app has any options in its
mix.exsthat qualify the dependency, e.g.might need to be just:
The
optionalparameter is one of those weird gotchas that in effect makes the child app say “hey parent – your call on what to do here.” In effect, it requires the parent app to be aware of what the child app is doing EVEN IF the parent isn’t directly calling that dependency.klo
Thanks for the reply. i realized the app1 and app2 might be a bit confusing so lets call one app
fetch(the child app in this case) which usesex_aws_lambdaand “parent” app calledworker.Workerhasex_aws_lambdaalready inside of themix.exs.fetchalso hasex_aws_lambdainside ofmix.exsalso.Workeris also not callingex_aws_lambdadirectly inside of the code. We haveex_aws_lambdainside ofWorkerbecause inside offetchwe describeex_aws_lambdaas an optional dep which gives the “parent” app (worker) in this case to define the depI realized in my example i may have crossed the wires and confused myself.
stefanchrobot
The “parent” app needs to add the library as a dependency only if it explicitly calls it. Looking at the error, it seems that this is the case here.
fireproofsocks
It feels like forcing the “parent” app (app2 in this example) to specify this as a dependency is giving the parent too much knowledge about an implementation detail. Or is it expected that when an app depends on other smaller apps, the parent may need to explicitly list the dependencies of its dependencies?
stefanchrobot
What’s happening in
lib/app2/client.ex:40: App2.Client.get_page/2? Ifapp2wants to useExAwsdirectly, it needs to add it to it’s own dependencies.