przemyxe0p
Hi,
I am wondering why my solution wil not work
1. source: Perfect Numbers in Elixir on Exercism
2. solution attempt:
@spec classify(number :: integer) :: {:ok, atom} | {:error, String.t()}
def classify(number) do
case aliquot_sum(number) do
number -> ok(:perfect)
x when x > number -> ok(:abundant)
x when x < number -> ok(:deficient)
end
end
defp ok(item), do: {:ok, item}
defp aliquot_sum(number), do: get_divisors(number) |> Enum.sum()
defp get_divisors(number, divisor \\ 1, acc \\ [])
defp get_divisors(number, divisor, acc) when divisor > div(number,2), do: acc
defp get_divisors(number, divisor, acc) when rem(number, divisor) == 0,
do: get_divisors(number, divisor + 1, [divisor | acc])
defp get_divisors(number, divisor, acc), do: get_divisors(number, divisor + 1, acc)
end
3. question:
Complier is saying:
this clause cannot match because a previous clause at line 15
always matchesElixir
perfect_numbers.ex(15, 7): related
and
variable "number" is unused (there is a variable with the same name in the
context, use the pin operator (^) to match on it or prefix this variable
with underscore if it is not meant to be used)Elixir
Why is that, why it cannot match with number passed to function?
Where Next?
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Latest on Elixir Forum
Sponsor Spotlight
Supporting innovation across the BEAM ecosystem.
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #elixirconf-eu
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
Our Sponsors
Build Elixir applications with speed and confidence.
Supporting innovation across the BEAM ecosystem.
We build reliable cloud platforms for business-critical systems.
Catch errors, track performance, monitor hosts and more.
Error tracking, logs, uptime, and Just Enough APM. Built for developers.
Bringing learning, work and compliance together since 1987.
**Building the future of software with AI, trust, and human connection.**
The deployment platform built for Elixir: PaaS ease, VPS control.
The team behind Membrane, Popcorn, LiveDebugger. Available for hire.
Courses that'll move you from confusion to "Aha, now I get it!"
Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
krasenyp
The first case clause matches any number. The clauses’ order matters.
przemyxe0p
But I used the same variable name in function clause, so I would expect that It would match against it
krasenyp
Oh, I get you now. You can use the pin operator
^number.kokolegorille
No, your logic is wrong and number might not be what You think…
As soon as there is a match, the rest of the case is discarded
the number in the case is not the number parameter, it is a new number
You probably should write this with cond
przemyxe0p
After adding ^ operator it’s right why should I use cond? What is more “idiomatic” whatever this “idiomatic” word mean?
kokolegorille
Because it’s very rare to use ^number in the case
Yet, You can do as You like
krasenyp
In my experience it’s very rare to use
condbut it’s still valid.przemyxe0p
Last question, i cannot find explanatio why this works that way. Do you have explanation or link to resources?
krasenyp
sodapopcan
People have a weird aversion to
condfor some reason that I don’t really understand. Doing pure boolean checks is exactly what it exists for. Thecaseversion is essentially the same with unnecessary extra syntax. Usingcondgives added information that indeed all clauses are boolean checks. It’s only rare because this doesn’t come up as often in Elixir, but it certainly does come up!