mmyers

mmyers

I’m exploring different ways of interfacing with C code, and in testing C-Nodes, my ExUnit tests were failing randomly. I start the C-Node process using Port.open. And I found that if I call Process.sleep(50) after opening the Port, then all the tests succeed.

Is this a good way to do it?
Is there a better way to wait for the C-Node to be ready to accept a connection?

Showing Posts 1 to 7

ityonemo

ityonemo

Use net_kernel.monitor_nodes/2, then launch, the wait to have a nodeup message delivered to your test and block on a receive; then continue with your tests.

mmyers

mmyers OP

I’m not sure :net_kernel.monitor_nodes will give me what I’m looking for. I want to know when it is safe to connect to the C-Node. And according to the Erlang docs:

A nodeup message is delivered to all subscribing processes when a new node is connected

Maybe just a retry with a timeout or limit on the number of retries will work.

benwilson512

benwilson512

Author of Craft GraphQL APIs in Elixir with Absinthe

How would the C node be connected, but not ready to be connected to?

mmyers

mmyers OP

How would the C node be connected, but not ready to be connected to?

Exactly. The C-Node is not connected initially, which is why net_kernel.monitor_nodes won’t work.
There is a delay between starting the C-Node process, and the C-Node having an open socket, ready to receive a connection from an Elixir/Erlang node. That delay is what I want to account for with something better than a fixed sleep time.

benwilson512

benwilson512

Author of Craft GraphQL APIs in Elixir with Absinthe

Which is what the messaging solution provides. You :net_kernel.monitor_nodes, and then receive do with a pattern to wait for the nodeup message.

mmyers

mmyers OP

Thanks for your feedback. I have a solution.

The problem I was seeing in my tests occurred when trying to send a message before the C node was listening.

    Elixir                        C node        
-------------      ------------------------------------
  Port.open()  --->   OS process starts running C node
                                    |
  Send message ---> (X) not ready, Epmd connection fails
                                    |
                     (ei_listen, ei_publish, ei_accept)
  Send message --->    Epmd connection to C node (OK)

Comments from @benwilson512 and @ityonemo made me think, “What if the C node initiated the connection back to the Elixir node, instead of the other way around?” And maybe that’s how they were thinking it worked (or should have worked) in the first place. The initial code was just from sample C node code found on online, where the C node published itself to Epmd and listened, waiting for Elixir nodes to connect, as diagrammed above.

So I changed the C node to initiate the node connection, rather than just waiting for a connection:

    Elixir                     C node
--------------      --------------------------------
Port.open()    ---> OS process starts running C node
                                 |
connected (OK) <---        ei_connect()

And after I remembered that C nodes are hidden, and used :net_kernel.monitor_nodes(true, node_type: :hidden), then I did get a :nodeup message!

This also simplified the code on the C node side, I can just call ei_connect, and don’t have to use ei_listen, ei_publish and ei_accept.

ityonemo

ityonemo

shoot! I should have been more specific and reminded you that C nodes are hidden.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews