spacemonk
Defining function with same arity but different map values in one of param
Hi! I might be asking a silly one, sorry for that and thanks for your time!
my aim is to implement quite simple logic:
the get_or_create_movie could be called with first param with “type” = “movie”, in that case I do not care about any other params and the code stays the same
if the first param contains “type” => “tv-series”, then the logic start to differ according to values. I feel that the straightforward approach I took looks not really pretty 
def get_or_create_movie(%{ "type" => "movie" } = movie) do
# same movie code
end
def get_or_create_movie(%{ "type" => "movie" } = movie, _like_time) do
# same movie code
end
def get_or_create_movie(%{ "type" => "movie" } = movie, _like_time, _review_text) do
# same movie code
end
def get_or_create_movie(%{ "type" => "tv-series" } = series) do
# only series code
end
def get_or_create_movie(%{ "type" => "tv-series" } = series, like_time) do
# like_time only series code
end
def get_or_create_movie(%{ "type" => "tv-series" } = series, like_time, review_text) do
# like_time and review text only series code
end
the dyalizer complains (warning) that the clauses /2 and /3 was previously defined.
the function could be called with “type” = “movie” in the first param and with second and/or third params present
Marked As Solved
al2o3cr
Each arity (the number after the /) is effectively a separate function. You can capture one with the defaults by using a smaller number:
defmodule Foo do
def bar(x, y \\ 1, z \\ 2) do
{x, y, z}
end
end
Enum.map([:a, :b, :c], &Foo.bar/1)
# => [{:a, 1, 2}, {:b, 1, 2}, {:c, 1, 2}]
Enum.scan([:a, :b, :c], &Foo.bar/2)
# => [:a, {:b, :a, 2}, {:c, {:b, :a, 2}, 2}]
(The result for Enum.scan isn’t terribly relevant, it was just the first function that came to mind that takes a callback that expects two arguments.)
In both cases, the arguments that aren’t passed to the lower-arity versions Foo.bar/1 and Foo.bar/2 are filled in with the defaults.
It’s common in Erlang code to see a long series of function heads with short heads filling in parameters and calling longer ones. This is the same as what Elixir’s compiler builds:
def bar(x, y \\ 1, z \\ 2), do: ...
# is equivalent to
def bar(x), do: bar(x, 1, 2)
def bar(x, y), do: bar(x, y, 2)
def bar(x, y, z), do: ...
which is why you can capture bar/1 and bar/2 distinctly from bar/3
Also Liked
LostKobrakai
Can you normalize to just /3 functions? E.g. by using a default value if like_time or review_text are not passed.
Popular in Questions
Other popular topics
Latest on Elixir Forum
Sponsor Spotlight
Develop your skills with books, videos, and courses.
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #blog-post
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #ai
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #elixirconf-us
- #distillery
- #processes
- #forms
- #api
- #metaprogramming
- #security
- #performance
Our Sponsors
Build Elixir applications with speed and confidence.
Supporting innovation across the BEAM ecosystem.
We build reliable cloud platforms for business-critical systems.
Catch errors, track performance, monitor hosts and more.
Real-time error tracking, performance insights, and observability for devs.
Practical resources that improve the lives of professional developers.
Develop your skills with books, videos, and courses.
Enabling companies to succeed by building software people love.
Courses that'll move you from confusion to "Aha, now I get it!"