caslu
I’m having trouble integrating ash_authentication with the magic_link strategy. The igniter.install generator, which defaults to installing picosat_elixir, is causing a problem with the token module. I’m encountering the following error:
Elixir: an exception was raised:
** (RuntimeError) No SAT solver available, although one was loaded.
This typically means that you need to run `mix deps.compile ash --force`
I’ve already tried mix deps.compile and even installed simple_sat before running the command again, but the error persists. How can I resolve this?
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #ai
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 5- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
zachdaniel
You did the full recommended task?
mix deps.compile ash --force? Barring that, you couldrm -rf _buildand then recompile.caslu
Yes, I did try recompiling dependencies. I also forgot to mention that I’d already attempted that. It seems the error was a false positive from ElixirLS. Thanks again, Zach!
I have another question, if you don’t mind. I’m trying to integrate Inertia.js with
ash_authenticationusing themagic_linkstrategy, and I’m running into two issues:I removed the
sign_in_routemethod from the router to use a custom Inertia view,Login.tsx. This is a simple React component that makes a POST request to"/auth/user/magic_link/request". However, when I submit the form,ash_authenticationattempts to redirect to/sign-in. Is there a way to integrate with Ash without using Ash LiveView? Not sure if i saw a concrete example somewhere in the docsThe User resource generator created a policy that appears to only allow Ash internals to trigger the magic link actions. Is it safe or recommended to remove this policy? If not, how can I interact with these actions myself?
Thanks for your help and quick responses. Apologies for the slightly off-topic questions.
zachdaniel
auth_controller.exso it should be something you can change as necessary.a. Set the context
%{ash_authentication?: true}on your requests so that the bypass is hitb. you can create your own copy of that bypass and add it alongside the ash authentication one, using a different key
c. create a special actor, called something like
%Authenticator{}, and write a custom simple check (like the one builtin to AA) that allows that actor to do whatever actions it wants.caslu
I’ll give more context about the first item, basically Inertia provides a
render_inertiafunction to render react (in my case) components, and on the client side i should be able to dispatch to an action with this snippet:There’s two problems with that approach:
Apparently
auth/user/magic_link/requestexpect a body like:%{"user" => %{"email" => email}and inertia sends only%{"email" => email}. Also, looks like somewhere in ash have a redirect to/sign-inwhen i dispach apostthis way, but the route do not exists since i removed to use my own views.Which leaves me to the second approach that i tried to solve this, create an endpoint
post /loginand manually interact with magic link ash modules at phoenix controller side, but i still cannot get it.I know that with live view i could use the AshPhoenix.Form to trigger the magic link request action, but i’m not sure how would i do this in dead views with inertia
caslu
@zachdaniel don’t worry, i got it, i was trying to trigger the plug from MagicLinkStrategy but i should just trigger the action instead as this part of MagicLink module docs suggests. Thanks anyway for trying to help me with this