ariandanim

ariandanim

Does it okay if I never use mix test?

I am currently developing app but never try to use mix test, because some of code I made custom in lib folder, sometime when i try make account like mix phx.gen.auth Accounts User users, i try to made custom in the code. but when try make mix test some failure comes in like below :

  1) test confirm email does not update email with invalid token (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
     test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:192
     match (=) failed
     code:  assert {:live_redirect, %{to: path, flash: flash}} = redirect
     left:  {:live_redirect, %{flash: flash, to: path}}
     right: {
              :redirect,
              %{
                flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."},
                to: "/users/log_in"
              }
            }
     stacktrace:
       test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:194: (test)



  2) test update email form renders errors with invalid data (phx-submit) (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
     test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:68
     ** (MatchError) no match of right hand side value: {:error, {:redirect, %{to: "/users/log_in", flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."}}}}
     code: {:ok, lv, _html} = live(conn, ~p"/users/settings")
     stacktrace:
       test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:69: (test)



  3) test Settings page renders settings page (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
     test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:9
     ** (MatchError) no match of right hand side value: {:error, {:redirect, %{to: "/users/log_in", flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."}}}}
     code: {:ok, _lv, html} =
     stacktrace:
       test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:10: (test)

.

  4) test update email form updates the user email (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
     test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:35
     ** (MatchError) no match of right hand side value: {:error, {:redirect, %{to: "/users/log_in", flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."}}}}
     code: {:ok, lv, _html} = live(conn, ~p"/users/settings")
     stacktrace:
       test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:38: (test)

.

  5) test update email form renders errors with invalid data (phx-change) (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
     test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:52
     ** (MatchError) no match of right hand side value: {:error, {:redirect, %{to: "/users/log_in", flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."}}}}
     code: {:ok, lv, _html} = live(conn, ~p"/users/settings")
     stacktrace:
       test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:53: (test)

...

  6) test update password form renders errors with invalid data (phx-change) (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
     test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:121
     ** (MatchError) no match of right hand side value: {:error, {:redirect, %{to: "/users/log_in", flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."}}}}
     code: {:ok, lv, _html} = live(conn, ~p"/users/settings")
     stacktrace:
       test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:122: (test)

.

  7) test confirm email updates the user email once (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
     test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:174
     match (=) failed
     code:  assert {:live_redirect, %{to: path, flash: flash}} = redirect
     left:  {:live_redirect, %{flash: flash, to: path}}
     right: {
              :redirect,
              %{
                flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."},
                to: "/users/log_in"
              }
            }
     stacktrace:
       test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:177: (test)

...

  8) test update password form renders errors with invalid data (phx-submit) (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
     test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:140
     ** (MatchError) no match of right hand side value: {:error, {:redirect, %{to: "/users/log_in", flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."}}}}
     code: {:ok, lv, _html} = live(conn, ~p"/users/settings")
     stacktrace:
       test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:141: (test)

.

  9) test update password form updates the user password (TrainWeb.UserSettingsLiveTest)
     test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:92
     ** (MatchError) no match of right hand side value: {:error, {:redirect, %{to: "/users/log_in", flash: %{"error" => "You must activated via link activation that send it into your mail to access this page."}}}}
     code: {:ok, lv, _html} = live(conn, ~p"/users/settings")
     stacktrace:
       test/train_web/live/user_settings_live_test.exs:95: (test)

Showing Posts 8 to 1

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

I didn’t intend to discredit it, sorry if it sounded that way.


And, as I work for a telecom nowadays I get it that not everything can be neatly put into automated tests indeed. Or stuff like Nerves[-like] environments where you actually have to send physical signals – another valid use-case.

So yeah I don’t disagree with you either, it’s just that I’d always default to automated tests if the environment allows for it. If for no any other reason than this one: from one point and on I want to progress and automated tests give you confidence that you at least didn’t break what was working before.

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

I mean I don’t disagree, but on the other hand it depends on the context. I’ve for a long time worked on a project, which had (and still has) not much time sensitivity and also not much scale. For quite a bit in the beginning this ran on a system without automated tests (a constraint of the underlying architecture). It wasn’t great, but it also wasn’t too bad. It at least was better than the manual stuff it had replaced. Eventually we switched architecture (to elixir).

So for sure there are many ways where skipping testing can turn on you, but I try to not discredit other paths.

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

Even in hobby code at one point you want to make sure the thing works, no? Manual testing does not scale.

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

Don’t forget that not everyone is coding for professional reasons. Also automated tests are not the only form of testing. So even with automated tests being a useful tool they’re by no means generally required.

To answer the question though: Yes phoenix cannot automatically adjust tests to take authentication into account, given it has no idea about what content should require authentication or not. Therefore adjusting the automatically generated tests for those additional concerns is required.

D4no0

D4no0

Working code is optional, getting paid is the important part :joy: .

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

Tests are written so you’re sure you’re delivering working code. If you’re one of the gods who know their code works without tests then don’t run them.

zachallaun

zachallaun

When you generate anything with Phoenix, it generates code in lib and tests for that code in test. Naturally, changing the code will cause tests relying on that code to fail. Update your tests or, if you must, delete the failing tests so that at least the remaining ones can be useful.

emadb

emadb

Maybe, I don’t understand what are you asking.

If you don’t want to write test, you can avoid to run mix test.
The failing tests that you are showing have a pretty clear error message and should be easy to fix them in you want.

Try to explain better your problem. Thank you.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Dmk
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews