yoavgeva
ArchTest – Architecture rules as tests. Enforced from bytecode.
ArchTest is an ArchUnit-inspired architecture testing library for Elixir. Rules live in plain ExUnit tests, run with mix test, and produce structured failure output listing every violation — with zero changes to your production code.
The problem it solves
Elixir has great tools, but there’s a gap:
-
Credo catches style issues and code smells within a file — it won’t tell you your domain layer is calling your web layer
-
Boundary gives compile-time warnings for declared boundaries, but requires annotating every module and can’t easily express transitive rules or glob-based selections
-
ArchTest fills the rest: dependency direction, transitive paths, cycle detection, naming conventions, coupling metrics — all in ExUnit, no production code touched
What it does
Write architecture rules as regular tests:
elixir
defmodule MyApp.ArchTest do
use ExUnit.Case
use ArchTest
test "services don't call repos directly" do
modules_matching("MyApp.**.*Service")
|> should_not_depend_on(modules_matching("MyApp.**.*Repo"))
end
test "no circular dependencies" do
modules_matching("MyApp.**") |> should_be_free_of_cycles()
end
test "no Manager modules exist" do
modules_matching("MyApp.**.*Manager") |> should_not_exist()
end
end
Key features
-
Dependency assertions:
should_not_depend_on,should_only_depend_on,should_not_be_called_by,should_only_be_called_by,should_not_transitively_depend_on,should_be_free_of_cycles -
Layered, onion/hexagonal, and modulith/bounded-context architecture enforcement out of the box
-
Flexible module selection with glob patterns,
excluding,union,intersection, andmodules_satisfying/1for custom predicates -
Code conventions: ban
IO.puts,dbg, bareraise, undocumented public functions, and more -
Coupling metrics: instability, abstractness, distance from the main sequence (Martin metrics)
-
Violation freeze for gradual adoption — baseline existing violations and only fail on new ones
Motivation
I built this for my own projects after wanting ArchUnit-style rules in Elixir and finding no equivalent. It works from compiled bytecode, so there’s nothing to annotate and no build step to change.
Links
-
GitHub:
https://github.com/yoavgeva/arch_test
Would love any feedback, especially on the DSL ergonomics and any rule types you’d find useful!
Trending in Announcing
Other Trending Topics
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #ai
- #phoenix_html
- #elixirconf-us
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
felix-starman
I’m excited to put this in a couple apps I work on that are older and perpetually are in the middle of removing an old pattern slowly
felix-starman
Some igniter tasks for common patterns you think would be typical would be cool
I imagine people likely wouldn’t use it to keep things up to date, but for a first generation of stuff it would probably be useful.
dimitarvp
I cannot quickly guess from the front page: are those
testblocks kind of like an extension of a standardExUnit.Case? Or are they an actual test file and assertions should go below the f.ex.modules_matching("MyApp.**.*Service")? Seems to be the latter but I want to make sure.yoavgeva
Thanks! That’s exactly the use case the freeze mechanism was designed for — snapshot current violations, only fail on newly introduced ones as you refactor. Let existing tech debt be,
enforce the new direction going forward.
The Freezing guide walks through the full workflow if useful.
yoavgeva
Yes, plain ExUnit test files — use ArchTest just imports the DSL macros. Each test block is a standard ExUnit.Case test, and the assertions raise if violated:
Nothing special — just ExUnit. The pipe is the assertion itself. The Getting Started guide has the full setup walkthrough.
yoavgeva
Great suggestion @felix-starman — shipped in v0.2.0
mix igniter.install arch_test # basic cycle-check file
mix arch_test.gen.phoenix # Phoenix layers + naming + conventions
mix arch_test.gen.layers # web → context → repo
mix arch_test.gen.onion # domain → application → adapters → web
mix arch_test.gen.modulith # bounded-context isolation
mix arch_test.gen.naming # no Managers, schema placement
mix arch_test.gen.conventions # no IO.puts, dbg, bare raise
mix arch_test.gen.freeze # baseline existing violations
Generated files are plain ExUnit tests — edit to fit your namespaces and delete what doesn’t apply.
More information in arch_test/README.md at main · yoavgeva/arch_test · GitHub
Add {:igniter, “~> 0.7”, only: [:dev, :test], runtime: false} and you’re set.
Lucassifoni
Very nice ! I just spent a bit of the last week introducing this same idea to some of my applications. Boundary is great too but does not work on this exact problem.
In my case I chose to write a basic elixir script that I added to my CI and work with text and allowlists, with a warning and error level. Text can seem naïve (and it is) but this allowed me to surface similarities in naming in various parts of the codebase that made me think “huh, I wouldn’t want to embark a developer with those 3 things having such similar names” and made that an error.
It helps me in refactors by making the “before” state a CI and lint error, and fixing occurences one by one. I think I should migrate to your tool.
byu
Very nice, I definitely want to add this to my projects.
Trying out
0.2I first attempted
mix igniter.install arch_test, and it’s failing; a manual install{:igniter, “~> 0.7”, only: [:dev, :test], runtime: false}in deps followed by compiling the dependencies fail with the same errors involvinguse Igniter.Mix.Task:eg:
It looks like
arch_testhas a reference to igniter, but doesn’t include igniter in its own mix deps?yoavgeva
Hi, Sorry about this issue, fixed on version 0.2.1, let me know if you have more issues
dimitarvp
Is this not enforced by the Elixir compiler itself? I clearly remember introducing cycles and being slapped by the compiler about it.