Qqwy
TypeCheck Core Team
When programming a module in Elixir, I like to start my module with one or two ‘main’ functions that show the main flow of data that will go on in here, and then write out the ‘small’ functions that are used internally in there.
I find this to be very readable, and giving future readers the opportunity to first see the problem from afar, and then zoom in to the part where you think something might need to be changed or updated.
Now I’ve seen multiple people writing modules in the opposite fashion, with the smallest (often private) functions on top, and the main functions at the bottom. I personally find it less nice to read, but are there any advantages of this approach?
Trending in Discussions
As the title says, please share what you’ve been up to with Elixir. Whether that’s been learning it, looking into it, making stuff with i...
New
Hey there,
It’s been more than a year since we started using LiveView as our main UI library and building a whole library of UI componen...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Quite interesting article Google brought me. Didn’t find any mentions about it here.
What do you think in general? Would you use togethe...
New
:warning: Security advisory: Decimal DoS vulnerability
A vulnerability has been published for decimal where very large exponents can cau...
New
It would be helpful to have a list of companies worldwide that hire engineers without prior experience in Elixir. Often, it can be quite ...
New
Anyone running long-lived stateful processes on BEAM? We’re building an AI agent runtime and would love to compare notes.
We’re a small ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
Aludel - LLM Evaluation Workbench
Aludel is an embeddable Phoenix LiveView dashboard for evaluating and comparing LLM prompts across mult...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming











Showing Posts 1 to 2- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
NobbZ
I do prefer to have public stuff at the very top of my source files, sorted by importance, after that all the private stuff in random order¹. Organizing the module this way, makes public stuff much more discoverable.
Nevertheless, especially when getting back from a C, C++, Idris, or Agda marathon, I often code in the opposite direction, because all of these languages need to have at least declare before use.
1: Whenever I realize there is a new private necessary I hit PgDn a couple of times, and when my cursor is in the section of private functions, I start to code/hack where I am.
karolsluszniak
This is indeed a nice question. Reading through Programming Elixir, I’ve got an impression that each public function should have its private helper functions grouped directly under it. This is certainly made easy by such a compact privacy notation of
defanddefp.Still, I didn’t find any info about this neither in the book nor in other articles (such as the style guide). Maybe it’s a delicate matter and no one wants to enforce one way.
I’d also suggest taking a look at source code of serious repos like Elixir, Phoenix or Ecto. I find Elixir sources nicely written and highly readable.