Sebb
I was just looking for documentation to build a Behaviour with some defaults.
I stumbled upon this thread:
As it seems, that’s still true in 2021. I did not find any documentation (except for the basics).
So I had a look at gen_server.ex and put a sample together (see below, see the tests for how I understand things). It does what I expect, but I have some questions:
- am I missing some important technique?
- (Solved with module attributes) the way I access the
optsseems a little odd…!? - (Solved by adding @impl inside using) I get this warning I can’t figure out:
warning: module attribute @impl was not set for function foo/0 callback (specified in MyBehaviour). This either means you forgot to add the “@impl true” annotation before the definition or that you are accidentally overriding this callback
lib/user.ex:2: User (module)
my_behaviour.ex
defmodule MyBehaviour do
@callback foobar(foo_arg :: any()) :: any()
@callback foo() :: any()
@callback bar(bar_arg :: any()) :: any()
@callback baz(baz_arg1 :: any(), baz_arg2 :: any()) :: any()
@optional_callbacks foo: 0,
bar: 1,
baz: 2
defmacro __using__(opts) do
quote location: :keep, bind_quoted: [opts: opts] do
@behaviour MyBehaviour
@foo_opt Keyword.get(opts, :foo, :no_foo_opt)
@bar_opt Keyword.get(opts, :bar, :no_bar_opt)
@baz_opt Keyword.get(opts, :baz, :no_baz_opt)
@impl true
def foo() do
{:foo, @foo_opt}
end
@impl true
def bar(bar_arg) when is_atom(bar_arg) do
{:bar, bar_arg, @bar_opt}
end
@impl true
def baz(baz_arg1, baz_arg2) do
{:baz, baz_arg1, baz_arg2, @baz_opt}
end
defoverridable baz: 2, foo: 0
end
end
def behaviour_fun(behaviour_fun_arg) do
{:behaviour_fun, behaviour_fun_arg}
end
end
user.ex
defmodule User do
use MyBehaviour, bar: :opt_for_bar, foo: :opt_for_foo
@impl true
def bar(arg) do
{:bar_implemented, arg}
end
@impl true
def baz(arg1, arg2) do
{:baz_implemented, arg1, arg2}
end
@impl true
def foobar(arg) do
MyBehaviour.behaviour_fun(arg)
end
end
test.exs
defmodule Test do
use ExUnit.Case
test "default impl is called and option used" do
assert {:foo, :opt_for_foo} = User.foo()
end
test "default impl is called when it matches" do
assert {:bar, :some_atom, :opt_for_bar} = User.bar(:some_atom)
end
test "user impl is called when default doesn't match" do
assert {:bar_implemented, 1} = User.bar(1)
end
test "user impl is always called with defoverrideable" do
{:baz_implemented, 1, 2} = User.baz(1, 2)
end
test "can define function in behaviour" do
{:behaviour_fun, 1} = User.foobar(1)
end
end
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution:
data = %{
name: "Periodic Table",
category:...
New
I’ve got trouble wrapping my head around the order in which functions are called in this snippet (from Phoenix’s authentication):
toke...
New
Is there any way to avoid the Hologram compiler running when using iex? It seems like the front-end code could potentially be disregarded...
New
** (ArgumentError) expected :max_attempts to be a positive integer, got: {:@, [line: 10, column: 19], [{:max_attempts, [line: 10, column:...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex











Showing Posts 9 to 1- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
lastobelus
This example was very helpful.
Would this be the “best” way to be able to have default functions that can be partially overridden?
Sebb
OK, thanks all clear now!
I’m marking this as solution for future reference, but all credit to @eksperimental!
Summary of what I learned:
There are 4 types of functions related to Behaviour-modules
1.1
fun_without_default- mandatory callbacks without default implementation, they need a@callback. They have to be implemented in the User-module.1.2
fun_with_default- mandatory callbacks with default implementation inside__using__. They need a@callbackand have to markeddefoverridable. You can’t forbid to override a function, it kinda works with some interesting effects (see above) but will cause a warning. They may be implemented in the User-module, if not, the default is used.1.3
optional_fun- optional callback, they need a@callbackand have to be marked inoptional_callbacks. They may be implemented in the User-module, if not, its an error if they are called.1.4
behaviour_fun- functions implemented in the Behaviour-module but not inside__using__.To access options
2.1 use
quotewithbind_quoted2.2 put the options into a module attribute inside
__using__eksperimental
init is set to be overridable.
format_status and handle_continue do not have a default implementation.
I think that pattern is good, if you want to raise on a specific pattern or type being passed, but other than that is it too much magic to define some clauses inside
__using__in another module, and maybe another library, and to define other clauses in the implementation.Just to be clear, what I am saying is that you need to set defoverridable for every callback you are defining inside
__using__, not for every callback in the behaviour. Because if you do not do this, and you do not annotate them with@impl, when you do annotate your implementations with@implyou will get a warning for every callback that you defined in__impl__with no@impl, as it happened in your original post.Sebb
This means I have to set
defoverridablefor all callbacks. So this is not possible:i.e. a default impl without
defoverridableis called if it matches (herebaronly matches atom-args) and the user-impl is called otherwise.Also GenServer does not set
defoverridablefor all callbacks:eksperimental
I have looked into it.
Here is a reduced case:
What happens in that you are definining some functions with
__using__but not all of them are overridable. So in the using context, you do not annotate your functions with@implbut in the implementation you do, so you have a function (bar/1 in your original example) that later gets annotated with@implin the implementation. You are mixing clauses from two different contexts and there for the warning.The solution is to add
bar: 1todefoverridableeksperimental
Good question. I will look into it when I have some time to spare
Sebb
OK, no warning when I add
@implinside__using__How does GenServer get away with not doing this?
opts-problem is also solved.
thank you!
eksperimental
the warning regarding the usage of
@implis because you forgot to set it inside__using__.If you do set it in
__using__and do not set it in your implementation, the compiler will not warn, as it realizes the one inside using is generated code by a macro.eksperimental
For reading the options, put them in an attribute. Btw, José published an answer related to this Unquoute not working for maps even with Macro.escape - #2 by josevalim