Sebb
I have this helper function where I exploit the Errors in Guards feature.
def non_empty(val, _msg) when length(val) > 0, do: {:ok, val}
def non_empty(val, _msg) when map_size(val) > 0, do: {:ok, val}
def non_empty(val, _msg) when tuple_size(val) > 0, do: {:ok, val}
def non_empty(_val, msg), do: {:error, msg}
(I can call non_empty({:foo}, "") though length({:foo}) raises)
Is there a way to put this into a defguard - without using is_list/1 etc?
defguard enum_size... ???
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apply_graft/2 doesn’t rewrite an add_many sub-workflow’s deps on an add step. Grafted jobs cancel with “upstream job was deleted”
Version...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #elixirconf-eu
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Marked As Solved- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
eksperimental
This is how I would rewrite your clauses into just two.
by checking for the type, it does not raise (anyway that is not a problem if you only have one when clause), but in my example it is needed, othewise later
whenclauses will never be evaluated if any prior clause raises.Personally I consider good practice to check for types.
Also Liked
eksperimental
@kartheek definitely yours is more performant.
Here’s another version I think even simpler, that builds on your idea.
defguard is_non_empty(term) when term not in [{}, [], %{}]kartheek
sizeis constant time O(1), where aslengthis linear time -O(N) - Naming conventions — Elixir v1.20.2Isn’t non_empty for lists a bit more expensive operation - depending on size of list?
Enum.empty?/1 just compares to when it is list.
Maybe your non_empty can be changed to this ?
or something like this only if you pass enumerable or tuple, else this will return {:ok, val} for strings, numbers, etc
eksperimental
please don’t! It totally changes the logic of the function, unless you are fine with it.
As mentioned by @karthheek, it will return {:ok, } in case of an uncovered type.
non_empty(0, "it is empty")will return{:ok, 0}Last Post!
Sebb
Sorry guys, I had a rough time and completely forgot about this thread.
Thanks for the insights.
As it seems we can’t exploit “errors in guards” inside a
defguard, so I’ll go with your proposal.