ekosz
Hi there, I have the following Reactor code:
defmodule CreateNewAccount do
use Reactor, extensions: [Ash.Reactor]
alias Accounts.Account
ash do
default_domain Accounts
end
input(:email)
input(:email_is_verified?)
create :account, Account do
inputs %{
email: input(:email),
email_is_verified?: input(:email_is_verified?)
} do
transform(fn input ->
input
|> Map.drop([:email_is_verified?])
|> Map.put(
:email_verified_at,
if input[:email_is_verified] do
nil
else
DateTime.now()
end
)
end)
end
end
end
But I’m getting the following error
Compiling 2 files (.ex)
== Compilation error in file lib/create_new_account.ex ==
** (Spark.Error.DslError) [CreateNewAccount]
reactor -> create -> account:
The create step `:account refers to an input named `email_is_verified?` which doesn't exist.
Did you mean `updated_at`, `created_at`, `id`, `email` or `email_verified_at`?
Looks like the DSL isn’t recognizing that I’m transforming the input. Is this a bug or am I just doing something incorrect?
Thank you!
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #security










Showing Posts 5 to 1- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
ekosz
Sounds good! Created the issue here: Issue · GitHub
Let me know if you would like me to add any additional context
jimsynz
Yeah that makes sense. We can’t validate the keys statically if the input is being transformed. @ekosz do you mind opening an issue on ash (it’s an
Ash.Reactorbug) and I’ll tackle it once I am back from my holiday. In the mean time you can move that behaviour into a change on the underlying action or process it as a seperate step so that the input map has the correct keys.zachdaniel
Ah, right. @jimsynz i think with the transform option we’d have to disable the check for the input map keys wouldn’t we?
ekosz
Hi @zachdaniel ! I get that, but aren’t I transforming the input using the
transformoption to remove the:email_is_verified?option and add a:email_verified_at(which it does accept)?Or is that not what the transform option does?
zachdaniel
Took me a while to notice this
The error message is confusing here due to the overloaded term “input”. What reactor is doing here is telling you that the create action on
Accountthat it is calling does not accept an input calledemail_is_verified?.So you’d need either an argument on that action or to accept that field as input using
acceptto resolve this error.