lucaong
CubDB - A pure-Elixir embedded database
CubDB is an embedded database written in pure Elixir, designed for robustness and minimal use of resources. It strives to be as developer-friendly as possible.
Some of you, especially in the Nerves community, already know and use CubDB since a while, and might have read the original thread about CubDB on the Nerves Forum.
Version v2.0.0 is now published on Hex, with big improvements and exciting new features, so I thought it is a good time for a proper library post here.
Since this is a long-ish post, here’s a Table of Content:
- Why CubDB?
- How does it compare to ETS, DETS, Mnesia, SQLite, etc.?
- What’s new in v2.0.0?
- How does it look in code?
Why CubDB?
CubDB is an embedded database written in Elixir. It runs inside your application, as opposed to on a separate server, and saves its data in a local file. In this respect, it is similar to SQLite, but offers an idiomatic Elixir API.
It is NOT a replacement for Postgres for multi-instances web applications, nor a distributed database, but rather a solution for cases when a lightweight but robust local data store is needed.
Typical use cases are applications running on embedded devices (CubDB runs well on Nerves), desktop applications, or applications running locally. CubDB is often used to persistently store data and configuration, as a data logging or time series store, or to persist state of an application.
Some of the features of CubDB are:
- Basic key/value access, and selection of sorted ranges of entries.
- Both keys and values can be any Elixir (or Erlang) term.
- ACID transactions to perform atomic changes.
- Multi version concurrency control (MVCC), allowing concurrent reads that do not block nor are blocked by writes.
- Unexpected shutdowns or crashes won’t corrupt the database, nor break atomicity of transactions.
- Manual or automatic compaction to reclaim disk space.
How does it compare to ETS, DETS, Mnesia, SQLite, etc.?
The FAQ section in the documentation has a chapter about this.
What’s new in v2.0.0?
Head to the CHANGELOG for more information, but in short:
- Vastly improved concurrency
- Improved
CubDB.selectfunction, which now returns lazy streams, allowing any custom composition ofStreamandEnumfunctions - Atomic transactions with arbitrary operations with
CubDB.transactionand theCubDB.Txmodule - Zero-cost immutable snapshots with
CubDB.with_snapshotand theCubDB.Snaphotmodule - CubDB.back_up for creating database backups
This major version comes with some backward incompatible changes, so refer to the upgrade guide on how to upgrade from v1.1.0 to v2.0.0. The data format is completely compatible across these major versions though, so you can upgrade and downgrade your code without needing to migrate data.
How does it look in code?
Start a CubDB database process by providing a directory to store its data:
{:ok, db} = CubDB.start_link(data_dir: "some/data/directory")
Basic key/value access
Key/value access works as you probably expect:
CubDB.put(db, :some_key, "some value")
#=> :ok
CubDB.get(db, :some_key)
#=> "some value"
CubDB.delete(db, :some_key)
#=> :ok
Both keys and values can be arbitrary Elixir (or Erlang) terms, such as scalar, tuples, maps, structs, and really anything:
CubDB.put(db, {:users, 123}, %User{id: 123, name: "Andrea"})
#=> :ok
CubDB.get(db, {:users, 123})
#=> %User{id: 123, name: "Andrea"}
Selection of sorted ranges
Selection of sorted ranges is done with CubDB.select, and returns a lazy stream that can be passed to functions in Stream and Enum. Data is fetched lazily, only when the stream is iterated or otherwise run:
# Put several entries atomically
CubDB.put_multi(db, [a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, d: 4, e: 5, f: 6, g: 7, h: 8])
# Get the sum of even entries between :b and :g
CubDB.select(db, min_key: :b, max_key: :g) # select entries in reverse order
|> Stream.map(fn {_key, value} -> value end) # discard the key and keep only the value
|> Stream.filter(fn value -> is_integer(value) && Integer.is_even(value) end) # filter only even integers
|> Enum.sum() # sum the values
Thanks to the fact that all Elixir terms have a well defined order, CubDB can be used to store and select multiple collections in the same database, akin to SQL tables.
Atomic transactions
Multiple operations can be performed atomically using the CubDB.transaction function and functions in the CubDB.Tx module:
# Swapping `:a` and `:b` atomically:
CubDB.transaction(db, fn tx ->
a = CubDB.Tx.get(tx, :a)
b = CubDB.Tx.get(tx, :b)
tx = CubDB.Tx.put(tx, :a, b)
tx = CubDB.Tx.put(tx, :b, a)
{:commit, tx, :ok}
end)
#=> :ok
Alternatively, all the ..._multi functions perform their operations atomically.
Zero-cost immutable snapshots
If you need to ensure consistency when reading multiple values, but do not need to perform any write, there is a better alternative to transactions that won’t block writes: zero-cost immutable snapshots. Using CubDB.with_snapshot one can perform several read/select operations isolated from concurrent writes, but without blocking them. Think about this like immutability in Elixir data structures, but in a database:
# the key of y depends on the value of x, so we ensure consistency by getting
# both entries from the same snapshot, isolating from the effects of concurrent
# writes
{x, y} = CubDB.with_snapshot(db, fn snap ->
x = CubDB.Snapshot.get(snap, :x)
y = CubDB.Snapshot.get(snap, x)
{x, y}
end)
Head to the API documentation for more information.
I hope you enjoy CubDB as much as I do ![]()
Trending in Announcing
Other Trending Topics
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #blog-post
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #performance










First Post!
zachallaun
Great write-up and really useful-looking system! I’m working on a small manufacturing analytics/monitoring project for my own use and have been looking for tools that make it as easily deployable as possible — this looks like a great option!
One thing that comes to mind: how easy do you think it would be to create a kind of streaming backup option a la Litestream? This seems like it should be pretty doable.
One benefit of this would be that I could have an application deployed on an embedded device, backing up its data to S3. In this way, I could easily “pull” a CubDB database to my local dev machine in order to develop against real data. It’s timeseries data, so it would even be possible (given the non-blocking writes) to create a little process that essentially copies one database to the dev db at the time intervals that the original data came in order to “replay” a particular window of time. May be simpler options, but this is definitely giving me some fun ideas that I’m looking forward to playing with.
Most Liked
lucaong
Hi @Gilou06 ,
@zachallaun already answered correctly to your (very common) doubt.
I just want to add that
CubDB.start_linkalready starts aGenServer, which is why you can start it as a child of aSupervisorand/or give it a name.If you give it a name, you can then use that name instead of the
dbvariable:As pointed out by @zachallaun , instead of manually calling
start_link, you would probably add it to the list of children of your application supervisor. Then, the supervisor will callstart_linkfor you, and you will still be able to refer to theCubDBprocess by name.Using a name instead of the
pidis usually better when running a process under supervision, because the supervisor might restart the process in case of a crash: then, the oldpidwon’t be valid anymore, but the name will still be valid (and refer to the new process).These things are not obvious when starting with Elixir, and take some time and some thinking to get used to. Unfortunately, we often give them for granted in docs, where we simply say
{:ok, pid} = MyProcess.start_link(...)- which works well in the console, but is not the way processes are usually started in a real application - and assume the reader knows what to do. I will try to improveCubDBdocs on this aspect.zachallaun
Completely reasonable question! If you aren’t used to this pattern, it can be hard to know what to do here.
Pass a
:nameargument tostart_link— this will be forwarded to the underlying GenServer and accessible throughout your application.You probably don’t want to be calling
start_linkdirectly, but letting your application supervisor do so. So here’s the pattern you’re probably going to want to use:You’d then use
:my_dbwherever you need to pass the db into the CubDB API.Kabie
Sounds like a great replacement for dets. Would definitely try.
Last Post!
johnsseruwagi
Is CubDB still maintained? As there has not been update to the repository since 2023