nilscam
Hello
,
I would like to monitore phoenix socket process, to count the current user connected to my application, without having them to join a channel.
defmodule ChatWeb.UserSocket do
use Phoenix.Socket
channel "topic:*", ChatWeb.Channel
def connect(_params, socket) do
:ok = SocketWatcher.monitor(socket.transport_pid)
{:ok, socket}
end
def id(_socket), do: nil
end
The problem here is that transport_pid is nil…
As explained chrismccord in this post, a socket transport_id field is nil until the connection has been authorized in UserSocket.connect/3.
Is there a way to implement a callback for UserSocket.connect/3 method, where i can get this transport_id and monitore it.
Thanks for your help.
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution:
data = %{
name: "Periodic Table",
category:...
New
I’ve got trouble wrapping my head around the order in which functions are called in this snippet (from Phoenix’s authentication):
toke...
New
Is there any way to avoid the Hologram compiler running when using iex? It seems like the front-end code could potentially be disregarded...
New
** (ArgumentError) expected :max_attempts to be a positive integer, got: {:@, [line: 10, column: 19], [{:max_attempts, [line: 10, column:...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 9- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
LostKobrakai
Can you elaborate on that constraint? Phoenix Presence basically solved the problem of tracking users.
nilscam
In this monitore function, i use Presence ^^
I would like to do something like this. But this code doesn’t work anymore with newer phoenix versions. Transport_id is now nil until the connection has been authorized.
LostKobrakai
You should be able to do exactly that in a channel.
nilscam
But as i said in the first sentence of my Post: “I would like to monitore phoenix socket process, to count the current user connected to my application, without having them to join a channel.”
LostKobrakai
Which is why I asked what’s preventing you from using a channel. Is there a particular reason for this constraint? Letting users join an additional channel doesn’t sound like a particular high barrier.
nilscam
I’m building a SAAS product. I bill for number of simultaneous connected users.
Actually, in the SDK I give to my clients, when they connect to my service, i force them to join a special channel which is only used to count the number of simultaneous users thanks to
Phoenix.Presence.The problem is that if my clients comment the line that join this special channel, they can potentially use my service for free without any limit.
LostKobrakai
Then it might be worth going the route @chrismccord mentioned in the already linked topic and implement a custom
Phoenix.Socket, which allows you to track the socket process using presence.nilscam
implementing my own socket seems pretty complicated compared to what I need.
I just need a callback that give me the pid of newly connected socket.
I think there must be an alternative solution that can solve my problem more simply.
LostKobrakai
Copy the implementation of phoenix and add the necessary callback or try to make a case for adding it to phoenix. The latter could include the first one as a PR.