sodapopcan

sodapopcan

TL;DR: Is there an Elixir lib out there that implements a version of Evision’s getPerspectiveTransform where I can just pass two lists of simple coordinates?

The X in my XY problem is that I recently started a new job that relies on a lot of image processing. Their current implementation is a little old and slow running on ImageMagick. I’ve been doing some spikes with Image and Vix (kudos and many thanks, Kip and Akash—very good work) to try and move it over to libvips but, as I’ve learned is sort of a thing, libvips does not support perspective distortions which we do need.

Thanks to a couple of good ol’ stack overflow posts and github comments, I’ve been able to get halfway there (code below for those who are interested) but now stuck on actually creating a transformation matrix.

I’ve read a bunch on the topic and will prob eventually figure it out, but I’m just wondering if anyone else has done this and has an easy answer :upside_down_face: Even if I do figure out how to use Evision in the way I want, it’s a pretty heavy dependency to bring in to call one function. Also just interested in general image discussion :slight_smile:

Anyway, thanks!

Here is the perspective code—sorry for the shitty variable names:

  def skew(%Vix.Vips.Image{} = image, {t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7} = _this_is_the_transform_matrix_i_need_to_generate) do
    alias Vix.Vips.Operation, as: O

    {width, height} = {Image.width(image), Image.height(image)}

    with {:ok, index_image} <- O.xyz(width, height),
         {:ok, copy_image} <- O.copy(index_image),
         {:ok, band_0} <- O.extract_band(index_image, 0),
         {:ok, band_1} <- O.extract_band(copy_image, 1),
         {:ok, x_1} <- O.linear(band_0, [t0], [0]),
         {:ok, x_2} <- O.linear(band_1, [t1], [0]),
         {:ok, x_3} <- O.add(x_1, x_2),
         {:ok, x_a} <- O.linear(x_3, [1], [t2]),
         {:ok, x_4} <- O.linear(band_0, [t6], [0]),
         {:ok, x_5} <- O.linear(band_1, [t7], [0]),
         {:ok, x_6} <- O.add(x_4, x_5),
         {:ok, x_b} <- O.linear(x_6, [1], [1]),
         {:ok, x} <- O.divide(x_a, x_b),
         {:ok, y_1} <- O.linear(band_0, [t3], [0]),
         {:ok, y_2} <- O.linear(band_1, [t4], [0]),
         {:ok, y_3} <- O.add(y_1, y_2),
         {:ok, y_a} <- O.linear(y_3, [1], [t5]),
         {:ok, y_4} <- O.linear(band_0, [t6], [0]),
         {:ok, y_5} <- O.linear(band_1, [t7], [0]),
         {:ok, y_6} <- O.add(y_4, y_5),
         {:ok, y_b} <- O.linear(y_6, [1], [1]),
         {:ok, y} <- O.divide(y_a, y_b),
         {:ok, mapimage} <- O.bandjoin([x, y]),
         {:ok, image} <- O.mapim(image, mapimage) do
      Image.write!(image, "is_it_working_yet.jpg")
    end
  end

Most Liked

sodapopcan

sodapopcan OP

So after a good sleep the matrix math stuff I was reading seemed less scary.

There are still some things happening that I don’t understand but for all intents and purposes, I got it working!

Here’s the result for anyone interested. If I can get this fully working for my use-case, I’ll write up a post about it.

So this function takes an image and a list of destination points to skew it to. The destination points are just given as a flat list of repeated x, ys in the order: [bottom_left_x, bottom_right_y, bottom_right_x, bottom_right_y, top_right_x, top_right_y, top_left_x, top_left_y]. This implementation always uses the four corners of the original image as the source points.

This is obviously super spikey code that shouldn’t have that very specific point-order requirement:

defmodule Foo do
  def skew(%Vix.Vips.Image{} = image, points) do
    {width, height} = {Image.width(image), Image.height(image)}

    [sx1, sy1, sx2, sy2, sx3, sy3, sx4, sy4] = [0, 0, width, 0, width, height, 0, height]
    [dx1, dy1, dx2, dy2, dx3, dy3, dx4, dy4] = points

    src =
      [
        [sx1, sy1, 1, 0, 0, 0, -sx1 * dx1, -sy1 * dx1],
        [sx2, sy2, 1, 0, 0, 0, -sx2 * dx2, -sy2 * dx2],
        [sx3, sy3, 1, 0, 0, 0, -sx3 * dx3, -sy3 * dx3],
        [sx4, sy4, 1, 0, 0, 0, -sx4 * dx4, -sy4 * dx4],
        [0, 0, 0, sx1, sy1, 1, -sx1 * dy1, -sy1 * dy1],
        [0, 0, 0, sx2, sy2, 1, -sx2 * dy2, -sy2 * dy2],
        [0, 0, 0, sx3, sy3, 1, -sx3 * dy3, -sy3 * dy3],
        [0, 0, 0, sx4, sy4, 1, -sx4 * dy4, -sy4 * dy4],
      ]

    dest = [dx1, dx2, dx3, dx4, dy1, dy2, dy3, dy4]

    result = Nx.LinAlg.solve(Nx.tensor(src), Nx.tensor(dest))

    [t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7] = Nx.to_list(result)

    alias Vix.Vips.Operation, as: O

    with {:ok, index_image} <- O.xyz(width, height),
         {:ok, copy_image} <- O.copy(index_image),
         {:ok, band_0} <- O.extract_band(index_image, 0),
         {:ok, band_1} <- O.extract_band(copy_image, 1),
         {:ok, x_1} <- O.linear(band_0, [t0], [0]),
         {:ok, x_2} <- O.linear(band_1, [t1], [0]),
         {:ok, x_3} <- O.add(x_1, x_2),
         {:ok, x_a} <- O.linear(x_3, [1], [t2]),
         {:ok, x_4} <- O.linear(band_0, [t6], [0]),
         {:ok, x_5} <- O.linear(band_1, [t7], [0]),
         {:ok, x_6} <- O.add(x_4, x_5),
         {:ok, x_b} <- O.linear(x_6, [1], [1]),
         {:ok, x} <- O.divide(x_a, x_b),
         {:ok, y_1} <- O.linear(band_0, [t3], [0]),
         {:ok, y_2} <- O.linear(band_1, [t4], [0]),
         {:ok, y_3} <- O.add(y_1, y_2),
         {:ok, y_a} <- O.linear(y_3, [1], [t5]),
         {:ok, y_4} <- O.linear(band_0, [t6], [0]),
         {:ok, y_5} <- O.linear(band_1, [t7], [0]),
         {:ok, y_6} <- O.add(y_4, y_5),
         {:ok, y_b} <- O.linear(y_6, [1], [1]),
         {:ok, y} <- O.divide(y_a, y_b),
         {:ok, mapimage} <- O.bandjoin([x, y]) do
      O.mapim(image, mapimage)
    end
  end
end

Usage:

iex> {:ok, image} = Image.open("path/to/image.jpg")
iex> {:ok, result} = Foo.skew(image, [0, 0, Image.width(image), 0, Image.width(image), Image.height(image), 0, Image.height(image)]
iex> Image.write(result, "foo.jpg")

A bit of a trolling example but if it works you should get a completely unaltered image :slight_smile: Otherwise, play around with the point values.

jerdew

jerdew

         {:ok, x_1} <- O.linear(band_0, [t0], [0]),
         {:ok, x_2} <- O.linear(band_1, [t1], [t2]),
         {:ok, x_a} <- O.add(x_1, x_2),
         {:ok, x_4} <- O.linear(band_0, [t6], [0]),
         {:ok, x_5} <- O.linear(band_1, [t7], [1]),
         {:ok, x_b} <- O.add(x_4, x_5),
         {:ok, x} <- O.divide(x_a, x_b),
         {:ok, y_1} <- O.linear(band_0, [t3], [0]),
         {:ok, y_2} <- O.linear(band_1, [t4], [t5]),
         {:ok, y_a} <- O.add(y_1, y_2),
         {:ok, y_4} <- O.linear(band_0, [t6], [0]),
         {:ok, y_5} <- O.linear(band_1, [t7], [1]),
         {:ok, y_b} <- O.add(y_4, y_5),
         {:ok, y} <- O.divide(y_a, y_b),

Slight simplification, rather than multiplying by 1 and adding a new value, you can add the constant in the previous call to linear (instead of adding 0).

akash-akya

akash-akya

You can import image operators for solving the equation, that should make it read better.

  defp generate_map(width, height, tensor) do
    alias Vix.Vips.Operation, as: O
    import Kernel, except: [+: 2, *: 2, /: 2]
    import Image.Math, only: [+: 2, *: 2, /: 2]

    [t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7] = Nx.to_list(tensor)
    index = O.xyz!(width, height)

    x =
      (
        t = index * [t0, t1]
        x_a = t[0] + t[1] + t2

        t = index * [t6, t7]
        x_b = t[0] + t[1] + 1

        x_a / x_b
      )

    y =
      (
        t = index * [t3, t4]
        y_a = t[0] + t[1] + t5

        t = index * [t6, t7]
        y_b = t[0] + t[1] + 1

        y_a / y_b
      )

    O.bandjoin!([x, y])
  end

But, maybe Nx is better suited for these types of array operations. You can switch between Vix and Nx, back and forth, easily. Using Vix for reading, and writing image in different formats and using Nx for something like this.

And yes, making a copy is not necessary.

Last Post!

kip

kip

ex_cldr Core Team

Simple range access like my_image[0..1] interprets the range as the bands to be returned. More complex ranges (designed to be compatible with Nx range definitions), return slices. The access protocol definitions are at here.

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
achenet
Hello, I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind. However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
Cxx-mlr
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution: data = %{ name: "Periodic Table", category:...
New
ChrisAmelia
I’ve got trouble wrapping my head around the order in which functions are called in this snippet (from Phoenix’s authentication): toke...
New
dillonoconnor
Is there any way to avoid the Hologram compiler running when using iex? It seems like the front-end code could potentially be disregarded...
New
thiagogsr
** (ArgumentError) expected :max_attempts to be a positive integer, got: {:@, [line: 10, column: 19], [{:max_attempts, [line: 10, column:...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
garrison
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language. Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mcass19
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews