seanhandley
While writing mocks for an Elixir test suite, I found that mock_with sets up a global mock object which prevents you from safely being able to set a test as async: true.
We’ve been using Mox reliably to mock out our own internal code by setting the @callback attribute on methods we wish to mock, thus treating them as behaviours.
The trouble we’ve hit is when we need to mock a third party module, e.g. Redix (a Redis client). We can patch their library with the relevant @callback attributes, but is there a better and cleaner way to implement unobtrusive, async-friendly mocks for third party code?
It’d be awesome to get a community consensus on this!
Where Next?
Trending in Questions
Other Trending Topics
Latest on Elixir Forum
Sponsor Spotlight
Producing high quality Elixir screencasts since 2017.
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
Our Sponsors
Build Elixir applications with speed and confidence.
Supporting innovation across the BEAM ecosystem.
We build reliable cloud platforms for business-critical systems.
Catch errors, track performance, monitor hosts and more.
Elixir, Erlang & BEAM conferences from Code Sync - join us in 2026!
Practical resources that improve the lives of professional developers.
Bringing learning, work and compliance together since 1987.
The deployment platform built for Elixir: PaaS ease, VPS control.
The team behind Membrane, Popcorn, LiveDebugger. Available for hire.
Courses that'll move you from confusion to "Aha, now I get it!"
Most Liked- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
benwilson512
You could always add your own
Redisbehaviour and then haveRedixsimply be one possible implementation of it. IE, mockMyApp.Redis`` instead of mockingRedix`. That’s what I’ve done for stuff at least.OvermindDL1
In my opinion, mocking should never ever be done, instead anything that might be mocked should instead be passed into the modules and functions that use it, that way at test time you can pass in something different, this way you retain full async and no surprises about where things come from (plus you might find later that you suddenly need different implementations of something!).
Last Post!
seanhandley
Thanks for all the great responses folks!