josefrichter

josefrichter

I was looking at recursion, Sasa Juric’s talk on parsers and combinators, and was curious how a parser from roman to arabic numbners could look like (not the other way around, I’ve seen some examples of that here).

I feel like this could be just a 5-10 lines recursive function in elixir, but it’s a bit beyond my skills. In other languages, I’ve seen only kinda “brute force” approaches where the roman number was sliced and compared to some dictionary like “X”: 10, “IX”: 9, etc. I guess there should be a much more elegant way to implement that tricky bit of subtraction logic in roman numbers.

Did anyone try this exercise before? Sounds like a nice job interview question :slight_smile:

Showing Posts 1 to 5

idi527

idi527

:waving_hand:

Roman numerals/Decode - Rosetta Code might be interesting for you.

And

  def decode(<<x>>), do: to_value(x)

  def decode(<<h1, h2, rest::bytes>>) do
    case {to_value(h1), to_value(h2)} do
      {v1, v2} when v1 < v2 -> v2 - v1 + decode(rest)
      {v1, _} -> v1 + decode(<<h2, rest::bytes>>)
    end
  end

  def decode(""), do: 0

  defp to_value(?M), do: 1000
  defp to_value(?D), do: 500
  defp to_value(?C), do: 100
  defp to_value(?L), do: 50
  defp to_value(?X), do: 10
  defp to_value(?V), do: 5
  defp to_value(?I), do: 1

if you want to decode binaries instead of lists.

josefrichter

josefrichter OP

bingo! that was exactly the subtraction logic I was hoping for, and I was right it’s probably gonna be just a few lines of code :slight_smile: not much of a challenge, after all :smiley: thank you!

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

You could avoid subtraction entirely and rely on pattern-matching instead:

defmodule RomanParser do
  def parse(input, total \\ 0)

  def parse("M" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 1000)
  def parse("CM" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 900)
  def parse("D" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 500)
  def parse("CD" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 400)
  def parse("C" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 100)
  def parse("XC" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 90)
  def parse("L" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 50)
  def parse("XL" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 40)
  def parse("X" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 10)
  def parse("IX" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 9)
  def parse("V" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 5)
  def parse("IV" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 4)
  def parse("I" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 1)

  def parse("", total), do: total
end

RomanParser.parse("MMMDXVI")

(nimble_parsec can produce similar code with less typing, fwiw)

Both this solution and the other one up-thread have a similar bug/feature: they accept incorrect numbers and do their best to render them. For instance, "IIIIVM" is parsed to 1006 by both and "IM" is parsed to 1001 by this solution and 999 by the subtraction method.

hauleth

hauleth

And You can do it with magic of meta programming:

defmodule RomanParser do  
  def parse(input), do: parse(input, 0)

  numerals = [
    {"M", 1000},
    {"CM", 900},
    {"D", 500},
    {"CD", 400},
    {"C", 100},
    {"XC", 90},
    {"L", 50},
    {"XL", 40},
    {"X", 10},
    {"IX", 9},
    {"V", 5},
    {"IV", 4},
    {"I", 1}
  ]

  for {roman, decimal} <- numerals do
    defp parse(unquote(roman) <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + unquote(decimal))
  end

  defp parse("", total), do: total
end

RomanParser.parse("MMMDXVI") #=> 3516
ityonemo

ityonemo

We have is_map_key/2 guard now!:

defmodule Roman do

  @numerals %{
    "M" => 1000, "CM" => 900,
    "D" => 500, "CD" => 400,
    "C" => 100, "XC" => 90,
    "L" => 50, "XL" => 40,
    "X" => 10, "IX" => 9,
    "V" => 5, "IV" => 4,
    "I" => 1}

  def parse(<<num::binary-size(2)>> <> rest) when is_map_key(@numerals, num), do: parse(rest) + @numerals[num]
  def parse(<<num::binary-size(1)>> <> rest) when is_map_key(@numerals, num), do: parse(rest) + @numerals[num]
  def parse(""), do: 0

end

Roman.parse("MMMDXVI") #=> 3516
Roman.parse("MMCMVI") #=> 2906
— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Discussions Top

AstonJ
The obligatory hello world thread! Who are you and where are you from? :stuck_out_tongue:
4663 61218 595
New
cblavier
Hey there, It’s been more than a year since we started using LiveView as our main UI library and building a whole library of UI componen...
515 12931 101
New
wmnnd
Hey folks, I wanted to share with you a project I’ve been working on for a while: It’s an Open Source (AGPLv3) newsletter tool. Think Ma...
New
raa-ziq
Hi everyone :waving_hand: I wanted to share something I’ve been building — NowBlind, a random chat app designed to help people discover ...
New
sntran
In my third year of college, around 2010, I found Erlang. A few years later, I found Elixir. I liked the ideas at once: many small proces...
New
gtcode
I’ve been tinkering with Lynx (by José) via hold_ledger. I used AI to write the code, a separate specification, the tests, and the Lean p...
New
Ganna
Hi everyone, I have 8 years of production experience with Erlang/OTP and I’m just starting to get to know Elixir. What would you learn f...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
kip
Localize is the next generation localisation library for Elixir. Think of it as ex_cldr version 3.0. The first version will be released ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews