josefrichter

josefrichter

I was looking at recursion, Sasa Juric’s talk on parsers and combinators, and was curious how a parser from roman to arabic numbners could look like (not the other way around, I’ve seen some examples of that here).

I feel like this could be just a 5-10 lines recursive function in elixir, but it’s a bit beyond my skills. In other languages, I’ve seen only kinda “brute force” approaches where the roman number was sliced and compared to some dictionary like “X”: 10, “IX”: 9, etc. I guess there should be a much more elegant way to implement that tricky bit of subtraction logic in roman numbers.

Did anyone try this exercise before? Sounds like a nice job interview question :slight_smile:

Showing Posts 1 to 5

idi527

idi527

:waving_hand:

Roman numerals/Decode - Rosetta Code might be interesting for you.

And

  def decode(<<x>>), do: to_value(x)

  def decode(<<h1, h2, rest::bytes>>) do
    case {to_value(h1), to_value(h2)} do
      {v1, v2} when v1 < v2 -> v2 - v1 + decode(rest)
      {v1, _} -> v1 + decode(<<h2, rest::bytes>>)
    end
  end

  def decode(""), do: 0

  defp to_value(?M), do: 1000
  defp to_value(?D), do: 500
  defp to_value(?C), do: 100
  defp to_value(?L), do: 50
  defp to_value(?X), do: 10
  defp to_value(?V), do: 5
  defp to_value(?I), do: 1

if you want to decode binaries instead of lists.

josefrichter

josefrichter OP

bingo! that was exactly the subtraction logic I was hoping for, and I was right it’s probably gonna be just a few lines of code :slight_smile: not much of a challenge, after all :smiley: thank you!

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

You could avoid subtraction entirely and rely on pattern-matching instead:

defmodule RomanParser do
  def parse(input, total \\ 0)

  def parse("M" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 1000)
  def parse("CM" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 900)
  def parse("D" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 500)
  def parse("CD" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 400)
  def parse("C" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 100)
  def parse("XC" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 90)
  def parse("L" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 50)
  def parse("XL" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 40)
  def parse("X" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 10)
  def parse("IX" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 9)
  def parse("V" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 5)
  def parse("IV" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 4)
  def parse("I" <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + 1)

  def parse("", total), do: total
end

RomanParser.parse("MMMDXVI")

(nimble_parsec can produce similar code with less typing, fwiw)

Both this solution and the other one up-thread have a similar bug/feature: they accept incorrect numbers and do their best to render them. For instance, "IIIIVM" is parsed to 1006 by both and "IM" is parsed to 1001 by this solution and 999 by the subtraction method.

hauleth

hauleth

And You can do it with magic of meta programming:

defmodule RomanParser do  
  def parse(input), do: parse(input, 0)

  numerals = [
    {"M", 1000},
    {"CM", 900},
    {"D", 500},
    {"CD", 400},
    {"C", 100},
    {"XC", 90},
    {"L", 50},
    {"XL", 40},
    {"X", 10},
    {"IX", 9},
    {"V", 5},
    {"IV", 4},
    {"I", 1}
  ]

  for {roman, decimal} <- numerals do
    defp parse(unquote(roman) <> rest, total), do: parse(rest, total + unquote(decimal))
  end

  defp parse("", total), do: total
end

RomanParser.parse("MMMDXVI") #=> 3516
ityonemo

ityonemo

We have is_map_key/2 guard now!:

defmodule Roman do

  @numerals %{
    "M" => 1000, "CM" => 900,
    "D" => 500, "CD" => 400,
    "C" => 100, "XC" => 90,
    "L" => 50, "XL" => 40,
    "X" => 10, "IX" => 9,
    "V" => 5, "IV" => 4,
    "I" => 1}

  def parse(<<num::binary-size(2)>> <> rest) when is_map_key(@numerals, num), do: parse(rest) + @numerals[num]
  def parse(<<num::binary-size(1)>> <> rest) when is_map_key(@numerals, num), do: parse(rest) + @numerals[num]
  def parse(""), do: 0

end

Roman.parse("MMMDXVI") #=> 3516
Roman.parse("MMCMVI") #=> 2906
— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Discussions Top

budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
axelson
Hi there! :wave: @frigidcode and I (but mostly him) have been running an Elixir Book club, we’re almost done with Designing Elixir Syste...
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New
jtormey
Lately I’ve been thinking about how to organize components as a LiveView application grows. One of the pain points I’ve found (for myself...
New
Null-logic-0
What IDE or editor are you using for Elixir development? Personally, I use Zed, and I really like it, but sometimes I wish there were a ...
New
type1fool
I just stumbled on a newly redesigned elixir-lang.org. :tada: It looks like @Software_Mansion did the work, and I think it is generally a...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
ausimian
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
kip
In 2021 I started a new library called Tempo with the objective of modelling time as a set of intervals - not as instants. In 2022 I gave...
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews