jack_m
Hi there!
I have a resource with a bunch of custom, expensive validations that I want to run on :update and :create actions. Everything works as expected, except that I use Ash.can? on the UI for the sole purpose of enabling/disabling/hiding buttons in a table view (which in a sense is a “:read" view) depending on whether the user can :update each record (and also perform other actions on it).
The problem is that Ash.can? internally creates a changeset and validates it, causing my expensive validations to be run multiple times just for showing the table view in the UI. Is there a way to avoid this? I just need to determine if the user is allowed to :update, I don’t want to validate the resource attributes, which I assume to be valid anyways when loaded from the db, and which in my case have nothing to do with the logic behind the authorization of the action.
I was thinking of manually creating the changeset and passing a custom flag in the context before calling Ash.can?on the changeset, so that I can skip the expensive validations when the flag is set. Is this the idiomatic way to achieve this? Although it seems a bit cumbersome, because it introduces an undocumented “accidental language” (to quote @zachdaniel) in my codebase.
Thanks for your help and insights! ![]()
Jack
Trending in Questions
Other Trending Topics
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










First Post!- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
FlyingNoodle
Ash
canhas a bunch of options that you can pass:Maybe
:run_queries?or:reuse_values?or:validate?can help you out?Last Post!
kamaroly
@jack_m, assume you have implemented
Ash.Policy.SimpleChecklike ash-phoenix-starter/lib/ash_phoenix_starter/accounts/checks/authorize.ex at master · kamaroly/ash-phoenix-starter · GitHub.I would call the
match?/3function directly. This would skip validations.