minhajuddin
I did a quick benchmark of lookup time for map vs ets as I am working with a lot of ETL stuff. ets is very convenient as you can communicate with it from other processes just by using named tables. And the performance difference between these doesn’t seem huge (lookup times for ets is 1 to 2x of map lookup times).
Here are the logs for your perusal. The benchmarking code can be found at GitHub - minhajuddin/lookup_bench · GitHub . Would love to hear your thoughts 
In the log, the first number is the number of records in the map/ets table and the second number is the number of lookups, so ‘ets_1000_100’ means it has 1000 records in the ets table and we are performing 100 lookups
There is a bug in the code which incorrectly reports the number of lookups when the size of the map/ets table is less than the number of keys, in this scenario the number of lookups is actually equal to the number of keys in the map/ets table
15:05:09.922 [debug] starting benchmark
15:05:09.922 [debug] loading data
Erlang/OTP 19 [erts-8.2] [source-fbd2db2] [64-bit] [smp:8:8] [async-threads:10] [hipe] [kernel-poll:false]
Elixir 1.4.0
Benchmark suite executing with the following configuration:
warmup: 2.0s
time: 5.0s
parallel: 1
inputs: none specified
Estimated total run time: 14.0s
Benchmarking ets_100_100...
Benchmarking map_100_100...
Name ips average deviation median
map_100_100 100.55 K 9.95 μs ±44.35% 10.00 μs
ets_100_100 52.12 K 19.19 μs ±57.85% 17.00 μs
Comparison:
map_100_100 100.55 K
ets_100_100 52.12 K - 1.93x slower
- - -
Benchmarking ets_100_1000...
Benchmarking map_100_1000...
Name ips average deviation median
map_100_1000 99.89 K 10.01 μs ±42.19% 10.00 μs
ets_100_1000 52.50 K 19.05 μs ±55.80% 17.00 μs
Comparison:
map_100_1000 99.89 K
ets_100_1000 52.50 K - 1.90x slower
- - -
Benchmarking ets_100_10000...
Benchmarking map_100_10000...
Name ips average deviation median
map_100_10000 100.04 K 10.00 μs ±40.33% 10.00 μs
ets_100_10000 52.72 K 18.97 μs ±56.81% 17.00 μs
Comparison:
map_100_10000 100.04 K
ets_100_10000 52.72 K - 1.90x slower
- - -
Benchmarking ets_1000_100...
Benchmarking map_1000_100...
Name ips average deviation median
map_1000_100 85.03 K 11.76 μs ±51.86% 11.00 μs
ets_1000_100 45.03 K 22.21 μs ±44.35% 20.00 μs
Comparison:
map_1000_100 85.03 K
ets_1000_100 45.03 K - 1.89x slower
- - -
Benchmarking ets_1000_1000...
Benchmarking map_1000_1000...
Name ips average deviation median
map_1000_1000 8.58 K 116.58 μs ±12.33% 110.00 μs
ets_1000_1000 3.93 K 254.60 μs ±14.07% 247.00 μs
Comparison:
map_1000_1000 8.58 K
ets_1000_1000 3.93 K - 2.18x slower
- - -
Benchmarking ets_1000_10000...
Benchmarking map_1000_10000...
Name ips average deviation median
map_1000_10000 8.74 K 114.38 μs ±11.29% 108.00 μs
ets_1000_10000 3.94 K 253.52 μs ±14.61% 247.00 μs
Comparison:
map_1000_10000 8.74 K
ets_1000_10000 3.94 K - 2.22x slower
- - -
Benchmarking ets_10000_100...
Benchmarking map_10000_100...
Name ips average deviation median
map_10000_100 72.80 K 13.74 μs ±102.80% 13.00 μs
ets_10000_100 41.67 K 24.00 μs ±39.73% 22.00 μs
Comparison:
map_10000_100 72.80 K
ets_10000_100 41.67 K - 1.75x slower
- - -
Benchmarking ets_10000_1000...
Benchmarking map_10000_1000...
Name ips average deviation median
map_10000_1000 5.89 K 169.64 μs ±31.67% 151.00 μs
ets_10000_1000 3.04 K 329.03 μs ±14.20% 322.00 μs
Comparison:
map_10000_1000 5.89 K
ets_10000_1000 3.04 K - 1.94x slower
- - -
Benchmarking ets_10000_10000...
Benchmarking map_10000_10000...
Name ips average deviation median
map_10000_10000 583.12 1.71 ms ±26.31% 1.48 ms
ets_10000_10000 269.62 3.71 ms ±33.27% 3.04 ms
Comparison:
map_10000_10000 583.12
ets_10000_10000 269.62 - 2.16x slower
- - -
Benchmarking ets_100000_100...
Benchmarking map_100000_100...
Name ips average deviation median
map_100000_100 43.00 K 23.26 μs ±1400.38% 14.00 μs
ets_100000_100 42.37 K 23.60 μs ±39.66% 21.00 μs
Comparison:
map_100000_100 43.00 K
ets_100000_100 42.37 K - 1.01x slower
- - -
Benchmarking ets_100000_1000...
Benchmarking map_100000_1000...
Name ips average deviation median
map_100000_1000 3.01 K 332.13 μs ±323.60% 210.00 μs
ets_100000_1000 2.75 K 363.27 μs ±15.39% 355.00 μs
Comparison:
map_100000_1000 3.01 K
ets_100000_1000 2.75 K - 1.09x slower
- - -
Benchmarking ets_100000_10000...
Benchmarking map_100000_10000...
Name ips average deviation median
map_100000_10000 232.37 4.30 ms ±66.78% 3.48 ms
ets_100000_10000 149.05 6.71 ms ±33.43% 5.88 ms
Comparison:
map_100000_10000 232.37
ets_100000_10000 149.05 - 1.56x slower
- - -
Benchmarking ets_1000000_100...
Benchmarking map_1000000_100...
Name ips average deviation median
map_1000000_100 39.71 K 25.18 μs ±4145.59% 15.00 μs
ets_1000000_100 36.51 K 27.39 μs ±107.98% 23.00 μs
Comparison:
map_1000000_100 39.71 K
ets_1000000_100 36.51 K - 1.09x slower
- - -
Benchmarking ets_1000000_1000...
Benchmarking map_1000000_1000...
Name ips average deviation median
map_1000000_1000 2.88 K 347.20 μs ±953.55% 251.00 μs
ets_1000000_1000 2.42 K 413.69 μs ±21.88% 401.00 μs
Comparison:
map_1000000_1000 2.88 K
ets_1000000_1000 2.42 K - 1.19x slower
- - -
Benchmarking ets_1000000_10000...
Benchmarking map_1000000_10000...
Name ips average deviation median
map_1000000_10000 181.11 5.52 ms ±218.75% 4.46 ms
ets_1000000_10000 138.43 7.22 ms ±12.59% 7.09 ms
Comparison:
map_1000000_10000 181.11
ets_1000000_10000 138.43 - 1.31x slower
Where Next?
Trending in Discussions
Hey there,
It’s been more than a year since we started using LiveView as our main UI library and building a whole library of UI componen...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
I’ve been using Emacs as my main code editor for more than a two years. It’s a custom build version although I’ve tried doom emacs and sp...
New
Hi there! :wave:
@frigidcode and I (but mostly him) have been running an Elixir Book club, we’re almost done with Designing Elixir Syste...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Just published claude-code-elixir, a plugin marketplace for Claude Code with Elixir support. These are the plugins I’ve been using for my...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Latest on Elixir Forum
Sponsor Spotlight
Error tracking, logs, APM, uptime and cron monitoring in one dev-friendly platform. Find and fix problems before your users notice.
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
Our Sponsors
Build Elixir applications with speed and confidence.
Supporting innovation across the BEAM ecosystem.
Catch errors, track performance, monitor hosts and more.
Error tracking, logs, uptime, and Just Enough APM. Built for developers.
Elixir, Erlang & BEAM conferences from Code Sync - join us in 2026!
Practical resources that improve the lives of professional developers.
Master modern tools, write cleaner code, and tackle real-world challenges.
**Building the future of software with AI, trust, and human connection.**
The team behind Membrane, Popcorn, LiveDebugger. Available for hire.
Courses that'll move you from confusion to "Aha, now I get it!"
Showing Posts 1 to 1- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
OvermindDL1
I’m actually quite impressed at just how fast ETS lookups are there.