dimitarvp
I am trying to make ergonomic test helpers like so:
def violated_unique_constraint?(
field,
{:error,
%Changeset{
errors: [
{field,
{_,
[
{:constraint, :unique},
{:constraint_name, _}
]}}
]
}}
),
do: true
def violated_unique_constraint?(_, _), do: false
Which in my tests I am invoking like so:
assert violated_unique_constraint?(:country_code) =
insert(%{country_code: "us", ...})
Which fails with:
** (CompileError) test/schema/whatever_test.exs:15 cannot find or invoke local violated_unique_constraint?/1 inside match. Only macros can be invoked in a match and they must be defined before their invocation. Called as: violated_unique_constraint?(:country_code)
You’ll notice I am matching the first parameter inside the second which AFAIK is allowed in Elixir and worked really well for me in other scenarios.
What am I doing wrong?
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 8- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
fuelen
violated_unique_constraint?has arity 2, sodimitarvp
That’s what happens when I am in a rush. Thanks for ending my pain.
lud
The error message is not about arity though, only about the fact that you cannot call a function on the left side of
=, though it may work with macros.dimitarvp
Actually you can. It returns
trueorfalseby doing pattern-matching on its parameters, so you basically end up with:assert true|false = another_function_call()lud
yeah I am trying to test that from the REPL right now ^^
lud
It does not work for me:
To be more precise, I know you can assert with a valid match expression, but that’s it. No left-side function calls (same rules as for case, receive).
dimitarvp
I can only assume this is related to you not actually running that in a full-blown ExUnit tests. Have you tried running your code there?
lud
I ran
mix new dimiand then wrote this:and this
And you get the same error. Left-side function calls on match operations are not supported. And I don’t see a reason they should be supported in assert since they would not be anywhere else anyway.
Edit: also it makes sense because you can do that:
So the match has to be executed since we may want to work with the bound variables. So it has to be a valid match expression.