polypush135
I just needed to re post this because 100% this on so many levels.
![]()
I’m not even just talking about the type checking here.
If you can’t answer this question before you are sure of your choice on most questions you have,
I’d recommend re asking the question.
But given the post about type systems and the fact it was asked to not make comments in that thread I felt this was worthy of its own post.
Honestly though this! Start with that question every time.
Once I started to force myself to ask this question on most of my issues I felt I was not addressing correctly I found peace in moving past perceived problems that had little impact on my own goals. These questions I imposed on myself often had been the source of frustrations and anxieties.
Trending in Discussions
As the title says, please share what you’ve been up to with Elixir. Whether that’s been learning it, looking into it, making stuff with i...
New
The obligatory hello world thread!
Who are you and where are you from? :stuck_out_tongue:
New
I want to open this thread for you all to discuss and help those who really like Ash but are still hesitant to use it in a real project. ...
New
We’re evaluating API mocking tools for OpenAPI-based projects and would love to hear what other teams are using.
We’re particularly inte...
New
Is there a word for the ~> symbol used in Version strings?
Do you also just call it a Squiggle Arrow™ ?!
New
I’m posting this in response to Jose’s recent tweet (Cr. link) :
People are sleeping on Elixir for a coding harness:
Hot-code swappi...
New
AcmeScript — Writing JS hooks as if I were still using Elixir
I’ve been having fun building a little something over the last few days: Ac...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
There are three potential reasons for members of this forum to have a look at https://vutuv.de
You are tired or annoyed of LinkedIn.
Yo...
New
Aludel - LLM Evaluation Workbench
Aludel is an embeddable Phoenix LiveView dashboard for evaluating and comparing LLM prompts across mult...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 5- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
D4no0
The problem being solved, if you watch the https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jf5Hsa1KOc8 is lack and quality of tooling that typed languages have.
Who needs this tooling? First of all beginners, this should speed up adoption of the language.
Is this a good thing? I would say yes and no, yes because there will be more elixir jobs and no because the community will degrade and become fragmented like it always happens with popular languages.
polypush135
Just to be clear I support the type checking system. I also think the work going into this language is top shelf and high quality and the work others have done is worthy of their time.
For me this question was way more abstract than just talking about if the type system was a worthy problem to be solved.
At the root of the question is the question “why”.
The “Why are we doing x, y or z?”
I won’t argue if the type system is a real problem or not because its not really for me to say,
but the fact someone is asking that question gives me confidence we are at least on the right path.
dimitarvp
In terms of generally always asking “why” I believe the core team is well aware of that.
polypush135
I don’t disagree,
This reposting of this comment was for the general crowd to remember this is the starting point for most of your problems not just working on the type system, but rather all problems should start here.
Not mutually exclusive to the original post this comment came from.
It was because of the greater context this question encapsulated I felt it worthy of reposting.
I can’t count how many times I’ve been frustrated at a job because I felt someone forgot to ask this question.
That’s all I’m saying.
sodapopcan
It’s definitely a thing in our industry! I used to work on a team with a few people who questioned things heavily. It was great! One developer would literally question every single feature request that would come through product. “Why are the users asking for this? Is there a way we could solve this problem by doing nothing at all? Would they be able to use an existing feature if we slightly altered it?” This lead us to start doing really quick prototypes so the customers could play around with their idea. Often they actually wouldn’t want the feature once they actually tried it. All parties were much happier.