sahilpaudel
Hi Everyone,
I have controller that takes request with a CSV file & email_id in the parameter.
What is does each read through each line of the CSV file and process the data and insert into the DB and returns the processed data for each line from the DB.
I add this processed data into a list and dump it as iodata into CSV binary and send that CSV file as an attachment using :bamboo library.
The problem I am facing is as the size of the file grows the request is taking time to process so I want to do it asynchronously.
Like I get /process data request and then send response as it is being processed to the client and do the job in the backend and send the mail on completion of the job.
Below is the snippet of my code.
def call(csv_path, email) do
csv_path
|> read_csv
|> dump_to_csv
|> add_attachment
|> Email.create(email)
|> Email.send_email
|> form_response
end
def read_csv(csv_path) do
csv_path
|> File.stream!
|> MyParser.parse_stream
|> Stream.map(fn [arg1, arg2] -> %{prefix: arg1, url: arg2} end)
|> Enum.flat_map(fn(params) -> url_convertor(params) end)
end
def url_convertor(%{url: url, prefix: prefix}) do
with {:ok, %Route{} = route} <- MyApp.process_data(%{"prefix" => prefix, "url" => url}) do
route
|> MyApp.processed_data
|> add_to_list(route, prefix)
else
{:error, %{changes: changes, errors: _}} -> [[prefix, changes[:url], "INVALID_URL"]]
end
end
def add_to_list(new_url, %{url: original_url}, prefix) do
[[prefix, original_url, new_url] | []]
end
def dump_to_csv(list) do
[["PREFIX", "ORIGINAL_URL", "NEW_URL"]] ++ list
|> MyParser.dump_to_iodata()
|> IO.iodata_to_binary
end
def add_attachment(binary_data) do
%Bamboo.Attachment{content_type: "text/csv", filename: "data.csv", data: binary_data}
end
Library Used:
:nimble_csv, bamboo_smtp
Can you help me how to make this process async.
Trending in Questions
Other Trending Topics
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #performance










First 10 of 14 Posts
cpgo
You could try using Task.async
sahilpaudel
Hi @cpgo Can you please help me out here as this is new to me ?
sahilpaudel
I updated my code to
But still no luck can you guys help me here?
NobbZ
reswill be a map, you can’t have a map on the left hand side of+/2.What are you trying to achieve?
sahilpaudel
This is what i want to do actually.
NobbZ
Thats the final goal. I meant that single snippet. It starts a single
Taskand then eventually tries to “add” the result of the call to a map. Though you can not “add” to a map. You can only add to numbers, and the BEAM does only know about 2 types of numbers, floating point numbers and integers.sahilpaudel
Yes, It was wrong of me doing that, I was just trying to mimic what was there in the Task.async documentation.
But that didn’t work and I am totally clueless how to go about that using Task.async.
Can you please help me here?
NobbZ
Task.async/1will start the job in a new process.Task.await/1will wait up to 5 seconds and then either return the result or crash the current process.So the following is pretty similar to spawning many workers and then joining them at the end:
Make sure you do not need more than 5 seconds to send each individual email though ;D
You can also increase the timeout by using
Task.await/2instead:Here you can see an async sleep in “action”:
sahilpaudel
Thank you @NobbZ I got the gist of how Task.async and await is working here.
I am just starting on elixir and so I have a request how can I achieve below task.
When the request comes to
It returns
%{response: %{message: "Request Initiated"}}And carry on executing the below function
Can I do that?
Also I wan’t to spawn new worker of each request for this route.
Thanks.
lucaong
If you want to execute the task in the background as a side effect, without waiting for the result, you can use either
Task.start_link/{1,3}orTask.Supervisor.start_child/{3,5}.Another common way to perform computation asynchronously in the background is to use a background job library like Oban.