Awlexus

Awlexus

Hi, I recently wrote this a some policies where I thought having a “not” operator would be useful. For example

policies do
  policy action_type(:create) do
    authorize_if always()
  end

  policy not action_type(:create) do
    authorize_if relates_to_actor_via(:partner)
  end
end

I tried searching the docs, but the best solution I could come up with is

policies do
  policy action_type(:create) do
    authorize_if always()
  end

  bypass action_type(:create) do
    authorize_if always()
  end

  policy always() do
    authorize_if relates_to_actor_via(:partner)
  end
end

Is this a deliberate design choice, or just something that hasn’t been explored yet?

Showing Posts 1 to 5

barnabasJ

barnabasJ

Ash Core Team

I think nobody has felt enough pain to implement one yet. There is a negate for validations.

https://github.com/ash-project/ash/blob/v2.17.3/lib/ash/resource/validation/builtins.ex#L71

I think building something similar for policies should be doable.

But Zach will hopefully correct me if I forgot to think about something here :wink:

barnabasJ

barnabasJ

Ash Core Team

Mostly, this can be done by switching between authorize_if/forbid_unless and so on. But that doesn’t work for the conditions.

barnabasJ

barnabasJ

Ash Core Team

Unfortunately the docs don’t reflect it yet. But action_type also takes a list of action_types so you could do:

policies do
  policy action_type(:create) do
    authorize_if always()
  end

  policy action_type([:read, :update, :destroy]) do
    authorize_if relates_to_actor_via(:partner)
  end
end
zachdaniel

zachdaniel

Creator of Ash

Yeah, would be great to add a negate check. Checks are more complex than validations, but it could be done. It should be done in core regardless.

Awlexus

Awlexus OP

For my purpose this works perfectly. Thanks for sharing!

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
achenet
Hello, I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind. However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
Cxx-mlr
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution: data = %{ name: "Periodic Table", category:...
New
ChrisAmelia
I’ve got trouble wrapping my head around the order in which functions are called in this snippet (from Phoenix’s authentication): toke...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
garrison
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language. Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews