paulstatezny
Regarding the phx.gen.auth generator: https://github.com/aaronrenner/phx_gen_auth
I’m wondering, does anyone have recommendations for modifying the generated code for an application that doesn’t have public registration? That is, an application where you set up “administrators” to start off, and then from that point on the way that users join is by invitation. This would be typical of an application used by a business, with only its employees as users.
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
Aludel - LLM Evaluation Workbench
Aludel is an embeddable Phoenix LiveView dashboard for evaluating and comparing LLM prompts across mult...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 3 to 1- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
paulstatezny
joaquinalcerro Thanks for all that detail! The path I decided to start with was similar, but I actually converted the confirmation workflow to an invitation workflow. I don’t know if it’s a bad idea, but I figure accepting the invitation is implicitly confirming your email.
joaquinalcerro
So I just recently modified my code to adhere to the invitation use case because as you mention, it is a pretty common business use case.
I am sure there are many ways to do it but this is my approach. It is important to mention that I didn’t wanted to change the library’s flow that much so in the sake of clarity, some copy and paste was done with the required adjustments for the use case. One last important comment: this code is still not in production environment but working in development as expected.
I will also like to have anyones comments and feedback to make this code better and safer before it goes into production.
1. Add the required routes to handle the invitation
This routes require that the user be authenticated
This routes do no require the user to be authenticated
2. Add a user invitation controller
The Flow:
a. Authorized user creates the invitation (new) and a user_invitation is sent by email
b. The invited user clicks the link (accept) and updates its name or other required fields.
c. The user is updated in the database (update_user)
d. Normal confirmation flow (in my case, we use this confirmation flow for legal purposes you might not need it. If this is the case, you might want to update the confirmation user’s field in step 3.
3. Templates and views are very simple and straight forward
4. In your context… in my case, Accounts Context
5. In your user_token.ex
I am keeping the invitation validity for 7 days
Added the “invitation” case in the days_for_context validation time
6. Finally, modify your user_notification.ex file to your specific case
I just added a function to handle the invitation case
I think this is it…
Hope this helps,
Best regards,
sfusato
Open the registration endpoint only if a valid invitation token is provided.
Then an admin has a form with one input field (an email address) and a submit button (Invite).
Looking at the original design spec, you could set up the whole
invitations_tokenslike theusers_tokensis set up. The base logic behind the two should be more or less the same.