paulstatezny
Regarding the phx.gen.auth generator: https://github.com/aaronrenner/phx_gen_auth
I’m wondering, does anyone have recommendations for modifying the generated code for an application that doesn’t have public registration? That is, an application where you set up “administrators” to start off, and then from that point on the way that users join is by invitation. This would be typical of an application used by a business, with only its employees as users.
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution:
data = %{
name: "Periodic Table",
category:...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #ai
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 3- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
sfusato
Open the registration endpoint only if a valid invitation token is provided.
Then an admin has a form with one input field (an email address) and a submit button (Invite).
Looking at the original design spec, you could set up the whole
invitations_tokenslike theusers_tokensis set up. The base logic behind the two should be more or less the same.joaquinalcerro
So I just recently modified my code to adhere to the invitation use case because as you mention, it is a pretty common business use case.
I am sure there are many ways to do it but this is my approach. It is important to mention that I didn’t wanted to change the library’s flow that much so in the sake of clarity, some copy and paste was done with the required adjustments for the use case. One last important comment: this code is still not in production environment but working in development as expected.
I will also like to have anyones comments and feedback to make this code better and safer before it goes into production.
1. Add the required routes to handle the invitation
This routes require that the user be authenticated
This routes do no require the user to be authenticated
2. Add a user invitation controller
The Flow:
a. Authorized user creates the invitation (new) and a user_invitation is sent by email
b. The invited user clicks the link (accept) and updates its name or other required fields.
c. The user is updated in the database (update_user)
d. Normal confirmation flow (in my case, we use this confirmation flow for legal purposes you might not need it. If this is the case, you might want to update the confirmation user’s field in step 3.
3. Templates and views are very simple and straight forward
4. In your context… in my case, Accounts Context
5. In your user_token.ex
I am keeping the invitation validity for 7 days
Added the “invitation” case in the days_for_context validation time
6. Finally, modify your user_notification.ex file to your specific case
I just added a function to handle the invitation case
I think this is it…
Hope this helps,
Best regards,
paulstatezny
joaquinalcerro Thanks for all that detail! The path I decided to start with was similar, but I actually converted the confirmation workflow to an invitation workflow. I don’t know if it’s a bad idea, but I figure accepting the invitation is implicitly confirming your email.